Wikipedia:Good article reassessment/History of poison/1: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 12:26, 30 September 2024

History of poison

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch • Watch article reassessment page • GAN review not found

Result pending

Looks like an old GA that hasn't stood the test of time, unfortunately. Lead is covered in {{cn}} tags, eleven citations to a somewhat academic-looking early 2000s webpage, another three to a blatantly non-MEDRS source. I want to avoid a WP:FIXLOOP, so i'll say upfront that I think this would be a quickfail at GAN and as such should be speedily delisted and brought back to GAN when it's undergone the necessary work. I'd be happy to assist in that however possible, but I don't think GAR's the right venue. theleekycauldron (talk • she/her) 12:21, 30 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@@ Line 3: / Line 3: @@
 : {{al|History of poison|noname=yes}} • <span class="plainlinksneverexpand">[//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Good_article_reassessment/History_of_poison/1&action=watch Watch article reassessment page]</span> • GAN review not found
 : {{GAR/current}}<br/>
-Looks like an old GA that hasn't stood the test of time, unfortunately. Lead is covered in {{t|cn}} tags, eleven citations to a somewhat academic-looking early 200s webpage, another three to a [https://web.archive.org/web/20071009001826/http://ime.healthpartners.com/IME/Menu/0%2C%2C23274%2C00.html blatantly non-MEDRS source]. I want to avoid a [[WP:FIXLOOP]], so i'll say upfront that I think this would be a quickfail at GAN and as such should be speedily delisted and brought back to GAN when it's undergone the necessary work. I'd be happy to assist in that however possible, but I don't think GAR's the right venue. [[user:theleekycauldron|theleekycauldron]] ([[User talk:Theleekycauldron|talk]] • she/her) 12:21, 30 September 2024 (UTC)
+Looks like an old GA that hasn't stood the test of time, unfortunately. Lead is covered in {{t|cn}} tags, eleven citations to a somewhat academic-looking early 2000s webpage, another three to a [https://web.archive.org/web/20071009001826/http://ime.healthpartners.com/IME/Menu/0%2C%2C23274%2C00.html blatantly non-MEDRS source]. I want to avoid a [[WP:FIXLOOP]], so i'll say upfront that I think this would be a quickfail at GAN and as such should be speedily delisted and brought back to GAN when it's undergone the necessary work. I'd be happy to assist in that however possible, but I don't think GAR's the right venue. [[user:theleekycauldron|theleekycauldron]] ([[User talk:Theleekycauldron|talk]] • she/her) 12:21, 30 September 2024 (UTC)