Wikipedia:Pending changes/Queue: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 04:44, 24 June 2010

WP:PCQ

Pending changes
Interface: Pages with pending edits · Pages under pending changes · Pending changes log ·
Documentation: Main talk · Reviewing guideline · Reviewing talk · Protection policy · Testing · Statistics

2010 Trial and 2012 Implementation

Historical: Trial proposal · Specifics · Reviewing guideline · Metrics · Terminology · Queue · Feedback · Closure · 2012 Implementation
Discussions:

Summary information for editors

Current status - Pending changes (level 1) was re-enabled on December 1st, 2012 by community consensus according to the 2012 RFC.
Logged in users – Logged in users (or users choosing to view pending changes) will see all edits as usual (unless the relevant setting has been changed in their preferences). All edits will still be added to the wiki and inappropriate edits must still be reverted or fixed as usual.
Logged out users – Until checked for obvious vandalism or superseded by appropriate editing, edits by new and unregistered users to "pending changes protected" pages will not be seen by users who are not logged in until approved. Edits by autoconfirmed users are approved automatically at level 1 when the prior revision is approved.
Policy – See the pending changes usage policy and the guideline on reviewing
Reviewer rights – Become a reviewer!.
Support and testing – Test page: Wikipedia:Pending changes/Testing. Bugs: Report them at WT:PC. For more information visit the IRC channel: #wikipedia-en-pc ^connect
Provide feedback and suggestion – Feedback page: Wikipedia talk:Pending changes. Your feedback and suggestions are appreciated.

See Wikipedia:Pending changes#Deployment for the deployment policy.

For the first phase of the trial (week 1), only pages listed here can be protected under pending changes. For the second phase (week 2), categories can also be listed, and articles in listed categories can be placed under pending changes in accordance with the policy. Each new day (starting 00:00 UTC), new articles can be protected, in four batches every six hours. The first day was 16 June 2010. All articles are considered for level 1 pending changes protection, unless stated otherwise.

Pages which are subject to too high levels of vandalism can be put back to semi-protection, in accordance with policy, this should be noted in the comments below.

Week 1

In interests of making this page navigable, please see Wikipedia:Pending changes/Queue/Week 1.

Many of the articles below were selected semi-automatically from a list of indefinitely semi-protected articles.
Please confirm that the protection level appears to be still warranted, and consider unprotecting instead, before applying pending changes protection to the article.

Week 2

Second phase, you may add articles as in the first phase but also categories of reasonable size. Note: we have a cap of 2000 articles on the trial as a whole. Rich Farmbrough, 15:48, 19 June 2010 (UTC).[reply]

Day 8

23 June 2010

Second phase, you may add articles as in the first phase but also categories of reasonable size.

Article	Status	Comments
Category:2010 FIFA World Cup players	N/A	See talk page. Only those that are currently semi-protected or warrant protection per WP:SEMI (as per policy). I have added the currently semiprotected pages from the category^[1] to the queue. If we want to use them in the trial then now! Amalthea 20:51, 17 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Category:2010 FIFA World Cup referees	N/A	This may also be worthy of the test. Like many of the other sports officials articles, all it takes is one controversial call (or a perceived controversial call) by these referees and their articles immediately become highly visible, BLP vandal magnets (e.g. Koman Coulibaly). Zzyzx11 (talk) 16:38, 20 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Northern Ireland (e\|t\|h\|li\|w\|lo)	Done	I think this is worthy of a test as it is a quite contraversial topic often target for POV and unsourced additions The C of E. God Save The Queen! (talk) 19:45, 21 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
George Osborne (e\|t\|h\|li\|w\|lo)	Done	Gets a lot of vandalism from unconfirmed users, currently not protected but in need of some protection, this may help put them off. Off2riorob (talk) 14:04, 22 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Wanker (e\|t\|h\|li\|w\|lo)	Done	Gets a lot of vandalism from unconfirmed users, generally BLP vios that require RD2 deletion. -- Alexf^(talk) 01:36, 23 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Stupidity (e\|t\|h\|li\|w\|lo)	Done	Gets a lot of vandalism from unconfirmed users, generally BLP vios that require RD2 deletion. -- Alexf^(talk) 01:39, 23 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Amit Singhal (e\|t\|h\|li\|w\|lo)	Done	Per request for protection on WP:RFPP. — Martin (MSGJ · talk) 09:55, 23 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
List of cutaneous conditions (e\|t\|h\|li\|w\|lo)	Not done	I think this is worthy of a test, occasionally vandalized. ---kilbad (talk) 14:46, 23 June 2010 (UTC)[reply] Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. 山本一郎 (会話) 01:18, 24 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Day 9

Article	Status	Comments
Care Bears (e\|t\|h\|li\|w\|lo)	Not done	About time I suggested this (and that comes from someone who happens to be in the know about them, on and off). Prone to vandalism (or should we say, "Fan-dalism"?) from time to time. --Slgrandson (How's my egg-throwing coleslaw?) 17:40, 21 June 2010 (UTC)[reply] Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. 山本一郎 (会話) 01:14, 24 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Latymer Upper School (e\|t\|h\|li\|w\|lo)	Done	School in England. Got regular predictable teenage vandalism before semi-protection, and often anon edits commenting on the new school badge or inserting links to one-off news events involving pupils that don't really relate to the school as a topic. -- Earle [^t/_c] 14:40, 22 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Cheri DiNovo (e\|t\|h\|li\|w\|lo)	Done	Receives regular, nasty vandalism from a moving IP located in Thailand if left unprotected; said vandalism extends to leaving comments on the talk page as well. Tabercil (talk) 23:25, 22 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
LeBron James (e\|t\|h\|li\|w\|lo)	Done	Been semi-protected since May. One article I thought will get a lot of eyes which can be good or bad. It will also be especially popular during the next two months in particular. -- Ricky81682 (talk) 06:42, 23 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Leonardo da Vinci (e\|t\|h\|li\|w\|lo)	Done	Even if it was jump of the queue, worth another shot. -- Ricky81682 (talk) 07:30, 23 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Russell Brand (e\|t\|h\|li\|w\|lo)	Done	Been semi protected for a while due to vandalism after a UK scandal. I think we could now consider opening it up a little. Ϣere SpielChequers 11:13, 23 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Mustafa Kemal Atatürk (e\|t\|h\|li\|w\|lo)	Done	Persistent anonymous vandalism and political POV pushing. An internationally sensitive subject with moderate visibility and a high level of historical controversy, as well as a relatively stable article aside from the POV pushing and vandalism. Gigs (talk) 14:17, 23 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Boris Johnson (e\|t\|h\|li\|w\|lo)	Done	I think this would be good for the trial - a high visibility page with consistent, albeit low-level, vandalism. TNXMan 19:52, 23 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Sydney Opera House (e\|t\|h\|li\|w\|lo)	Done	Article with high visibility (ca.60,000) frequently vandalised (10+ last month). --Elekhh (talk) 23:15, 23 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Julia Gillard‎ (e\|t\|h\|li\|w\|lo)	Done	New PM of Australia to be sworn in today, ITN underway. Article vandalised many times in the past hours and semi-protected minutes ago. Could be a good test case of Pending changes. --Elekhh (talk) 02:21, 24 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Day 10

Article	Status	Comments
Cheese		Silver-locked article with one-word title. Got almost 100,000 hits last month Purple backpack89 04:44, 24 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Day 11

Article	Status	Comments

Day 12

Article	Status	Comments

Day 13

Article	Status	Comments

Day 14

Article	Status	Comments

@@ Line 81: / Line 81: @@
 ! Article !! Status !! Comments
 |-
+| Cheese ||  || Silver-locked article with one-word title.  Got almost 100,000 hits last month '''<font face="Verdana">[[User:Purplebackpack89#top|<font color="#3A003A">Pur</font><font color="#800080">ple</font>]][[User talk:Purplebackpack89|<font color="#991C99">back</font><font color="#CC33CC">pack</font><font color="gold">89</font>]]</font>'''  04:44, 24 June 2010 (UTC)
-| ||  ||
 |-
 | ||  ||