Jump to content

Wikipedia:RfA Review/Question: Difference between revisions

Add links
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Browse history interactively
← Previous editNext edit →
Content deleted Content added
VisualWikitext
m *Add easier method of subpage generation (plain-linking link)
PastorMatt (talk | contribs)
375 edits
→Questions: You asked...I responded.
Line 19: Line 19:


#'''Candidate selection''' (inviting someone to stand as a candidate)
#'''Candidate selection''' (inviting someone to stand as a candidate)
#:It tends to make adminiship a "circle of friends" rather than a way to attract new ideas and concepts to Wikipedia.
#:...
#'''Administrator coaching''' (either formally or informally)
#'''Administrator coaching''' (either formally or informally)
#:A definite necessity, and should be done on a formal basis.
#:...
#'''Nomination, co-nomination and self-nomination''' (introducing the candidate)
#'''Nomination, co-nomination and self-nomination''' (introducing the candidate)
#:I nominated myself for adminship, and was eliminated under the "snowball" provision. If you have a procedure, you should take it to its conclusion and allow those who are interested to defend their answers fully.
#:...
#'''Advertising and canvassing'''
#'''Advertising and canvassing'''
#:If you do it, you need to make sure to fully explain the qualities needed for adminship.
#:...
#'''Debate''' (Presenting questions to the candidate)
#'''Debate''' (Presenting questions to the candidate)
#:Don't short-circuit the procedure as you did with me!
#:...
#'''Election''' (including providing reasons for support/oppose)
#'''Election''' (including providing reasons for support/oppose)
#:This seemed to work well. In my case, I didn't agree with the reasons, but at least I knew what they were.
#:...
#'''Withdrawal''' (the candidate withdrawing from the process)
#'''Withdrawal''' (the candidate withdrawing from the process)
#:This should be the ONLY reason a candidate for adminship is not brought up for a vote.
#:...
#'''Declaration''' (the bureaucrat closing the application. Also includes [[WP:NOTNOW]] closes)
#'''Declaration''' (the bureaucrat closing the application. Also includes [[WP:NOTNOW]] closes)
#:Impossible to do without causing offense.
#:...
#'''Training''' (use of New Admin School, other post-election training)
#'''Training''' (use of New Admin School, other post-election training)
#:I'm all for it!
#:...
#'''Recall''' (the Administrators Open to Recall process)
#'''Recall''' (the Administrators Open to Recall process)
#:I'm all for it!
#:...




Line 43: Line 43:


#'''How do you view the role of an administrator?'''
#'''How do you view the role of an administrator?'''
#:Maintain order, enforcing rules
#:...
#'''What attributes do you feel an administrator should possess?'''
#'''What attributes do you feel an administrator should possess?'''
#:Knowledge, organizational skills, collaborational skills, moderation skills.
#:...




Line 51: Line 51:


#'''Have you ever voted in a request for Adminship? If so what was your experience?'''
#'''Have you ever voted in a request for Adminship? If so what was your experience?'''
#:...
#:No
#'''Have you ever stood as a candidate under the Request for Adminship process? If so what was your experience?'''
#'''Have you ever stood as a candidate under the Request for Adminship process? If so what was your experience?'''
#:Yes. My experience was not very good, and I don't think I was treated fairly. I was kicked out under the "snowball" provision.
#:...
#'''Do you have any further thoughts or opinions on the Request for Adminship process?'''
#'''Do you have any further thoughts or opinions on the Request for Adminship process?'''
#:It needs definite revision and fairness assessment.
#:...

[[User:PastorMatt|PastorMatt]] ([[User talk:PastorMatt|talk]]) 17:37, 23 June 2008 (UTC)


{{Wikipedia:RfA Review/Question/Responses}}
{{Wikipedia:RfA Review/Question/Responses}}

Revision as of 17:37, 23 June 2008

A Review of the
Requests for Adminship Process

Welcome to the Question phase of RfA Review. We hope you'll take the time to respond to our questions in order to give us further understanding of what you think of the RfA process. Remember, there are no right or wrong answers here. Also, feel free to answer as many questions as you like. Don't feel you have to tackle everything if you don't want to.

In a departure from the normal support and oppose responses, this review will focus on your thoughts, opinions and concerns. Where possible, you are encouraged to provide examples, references, diffs and so on in order to support your viewpoint. Please note that at this point we are not asking you to recommend possible remedies or solutions for any problems you describe, as that will come later in the review.

To participate in the review, please create a subpage in your user area to hold your answers, by clicking Special:Mypage/RfA review, Once you've done that, add the following text: {{subst:RFAReview}}, to your usersubpage, and it will generate the questions on your subpage, as well as code it for use once you've completed your responses. Alternatively, have the page automatically generated for you and remove the top line of code.

If you prefer, you can submit your responses anonymously by emailing them to gazimoff (at) o2.co.uk. Anonymous responses will be posted as subpages here and linked to from the responses section, but will have the contributor's details removed. If you have any questions, please use the project's talk page.

Once you've provided your responses, please encourage other editors to take part in the review. More responses will improve the quality of research, as well as increasing the likelihood of producing meaningful results.

Once again, thank you for taking part!

Questions

When thinking about the adminship process, what are your thoughts and opinions about the following areas:

  1. Candidate selection (inviting someone to stand as a candidate)
    It tends to make adminiship a "circle of friends" rather than a way to attract new ideas and concepts to Wikipedia.
  2. Administrator coaching (either formally or informally)
    A definite necessity, and should be done on a formal basis.
  3. Nomination, co-nomination and self-nomination (introducing the candidate)
    I nominated myself for adminship, and was eliminated under the "snowball" provision. If you have a procedure, you should take it to its conclusion and allow those who are interested to defend their answers fully.
  4. Advertising and canvassing
    If you do it, you need to make sure to fully explain the qualities needed for adminship.
  5. Debate (Presenting questions to the candidate)
    Don't short-circuit the procedure as you did with me!
  6. Election (including providing reasons for support/oppose)
    This seemed to work well. In my case, I didn't agree with the reasons, but at least I knew what they were.
  7. Withdrawal (the candidate withdrawing from the process)
    This should be the ONLY reason a candidate for adminship is not brought up for a vote.
  8. Declaration (the bureaucrat closing the application. Also includes WP:NOTNOW closes)
    Impossible to do without causing offense.
  9. Training (use of New Admin School, other post-election training)
    I'm all for it!
  10. Recall (the Administrators Open to Recall process)
    I'm all for it!


When thinking about adminship in general, what are your thoughts and opinions about the following areas:

  1. How do you view the role of an administrator?
    Maintain order, enforcing rules
  2. What attributes do you feel an administrator should possess?
    Knowledge, organizational skills, collaborational skills, moderation skills.


Finally, when thinking about Requests for Adminship:

  1. Have you ever voted in a request for Adminship? If so what was your experience?
    No
  2. Have you ever stood as a candidate under the Request for Adminship process? If so what was your experience?
    Yes. My experience was not very good, and I don't think I was treated fairly. I was kicked out under the "snowball" provision.
  3. Do you have any further thoughts or opinions on the Request for Adminship process?
    It needs definite revision and fairness assessment.

PastorMatt (talk) 17:37, 23 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Responses

Please paste the link from the bottom of your response page to the BOTTOM of this list.

  1. User:Useight/RFA Review - added by Useight at 23:01, 12 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  2. User:KojiDude/RfA Review added by Koji†Dude (C) at 00:47, 13 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  3. User:Shalom Yechiel/Drafts and archives/Gazimoff's RFA Review added by Yechiel (Shalom) at 03:30, 13 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  4. User:Sephiroth BCR/RfA Questions added by Sephiroth BCR (Converse) at 09:21, 13 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  5. User:Dweller/RfA Review added by Dweller (talk) 13:20, 13 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  6. User:Giggy/RfA review added by giggy (:O) at 14:45, 13 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  7. User:Keeper76/RfA review added by Keeper | 76 | Disclaimer at 15:14, 13 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  8. User:Cobi/RfA review added by -- Cobi(t|c|b) at 15:36, 13 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  9. User:Gwynand/RfA review added by Gwynand | Talk•Contribs at 15:47, 13 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  10. User:Rudget/RfA review added by Rudget (Help?) at 16:30, 13 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  11. User:EJF/RfA review added by EJF (talk) at 17:16, 13 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  12. User:Malleus Fatuarum/RfA review added by Malleus Fatuorum (talk) at 19:46, 13 June 2008 (UTC).[reply]
  13. User:Fritzpoll/RFAReview added by Fritzpoll (talk) at 20:36, 13 June 2008 (UTC)* User:Epbr123/RfA review added by Epbr123 (talk) at 22:39, 13 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  14. User:Travellingcari/RfA review added by TravellingCarithe Busy Bee at 01:10, 14 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  15. User:Dustihowe/RfA review added by Dusticomplain/compliment 02:07, 14 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  16. User:Malinaccier/RFA review added by Malinaccier (talk) 21:52, 14 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  17. User:Risker/RfA review added by Risker (talk) at 01:56, 15 June 2008 (UTC
  18. User:Mailer diablo/R#RfA Review, Mailer Diablo 13:29, 16 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  19. User:Naerii/RfA review added by Naerii - Talk at 14:27, 16 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  20. User:Shereth/RfA review added by Shereth at 21:02, 16 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  21. User:Majorly/RfA review added by Al Tally talk at 11:25, 17 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  22. User:Hroðulf/RfA review added by Hroðulf (or Hrothulf) (Talk) at 13:11, 17 June 2008 (UTC). Probably wrote too candidly for my own good.[reply]
  23. User:Wizardman/RfA review added by Wizardman at 23:29, 19 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  24. User:Kevin/RFA_review added by Kevin (talk) at 09:25, 20 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  25. User:Husond/RfA review added by Húsönd at 15:31, 20 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  26. User:Stevenfruitsmaak/RfA review added by Steven Fruitsmaak (Reply) at 15:37, 20 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  27. User:Ynhockey/RfA review added by Ynhockey (Talk) 16:13, 20 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  28. User:LaraLove/RfA review added by LaraLove|Talk at 16:15, 20 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  29. User:Mr.Z-man/RfA review added by Mr.Z-man at 16:20, 20 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  30. User:Royalbroil/RfA review added by Royalbroil at 17:12, 20 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  31. User:thedemonhog/Requests for adminship review from –thedemonhog talk • edits at 19:06, 20 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  32. User:Vianello/RfA review added by Vianello (talk) at 19:27, 20 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  33. User:Alanbly/RfA review added by Adam McCormick (talk) at 19:51, 20 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  34. User:Faithlessthewonderboy/RfA review added by faithless (speak) at 20:16, 20 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  35. User:Ultraexactzz/RfA review by UltraExactZZ Claims ~ Evidence at 20:36, 20 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  36. User:Camaron/RfA review added by Camaron | Chris (talk) at 20:45, 20 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  37. User:Waggers/RfA review added by Waggers (talk) at 21:07, 20 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  38. User:Scarian/RfA review added by ScarianCall me Pat! at 21:12, 20 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  39. User:kotra/RfA review added by kotra (talk) at 21:43, 20 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  40. User:Finalnight/RfA review added by Finalnight (talk) at 23:34, 20 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  41. User:AstroHurricane001/RfA review added by ~AH1(TCU) at 23:49, 20 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  42. User:Hmwith/RfA review added by hmwithτ at 00:26, 21 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  43. User:Protonk/RfA review added by Protonk (talk) at 00:41, 21 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  44. User:Gonzo fan2007/RFAReview added by « Gonzo fan2007 (talk ♦ contribs) @ 01:29, 21 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  45. User:PhilKnight/RfA review added by PhilKnight (talk) at 01:32, 21 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  46. User:Pats1/RfA review added by Pats1 T/C at 01:52, 21 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  47. User:Parent5446/RfA review added by — Parent5446 ☯ (message email) at 03:10, 21 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  48. User:Nobunaga24/RfA review added by Nobunaga24 (talk) at 03:28, 21 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  49. User:Orfen/RfA review added by  Orfen  T • C at 06:51, 21 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  50. User:Hidden Glass 2/RfA review added by Hidden Glass 2 (talk) at 08:51, 21 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  51. User:Gatoclass/RfA review added by Gatoclass (talk) at 09:36, 21 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  52. User:Atyndall/RfA review added by  Atyndall93 | talk  at 10:11, 21 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  53. user:anetode/RfA review added at 10:25, 21 June 2008 (UTC)
  54. User:J Milburn/RfA review added by J Milburn (talk) at 10:32, 21 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  55. User:Orderinchaos/RfA review added by Orderinchaos at 11:08, 21 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  56. User:EconomicsGuy II/RfA review added by EconomicsGuy (talk) at 12:55, 21 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  57. User:DuncanHill/RfA review added by DuncanHill (talk) at 15:11, 21 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  58. User:Horologium/RfA review added by Horologium (talk) at 17:38, 21 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  59. User:John Carter/RFA Review added by John Carter(talk) at 18:30, 21 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  60. User:Drewcifer3000/RfA review added by Drewcifer (talk) at 19:20, 21 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  61. User:Fabrictramp/RfA review added by Fabrictramp | talk to me at 22:37, 21 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  62. User:Addshore/RfA review added by ·Add§hore· Talk/Cont at 23:38, 21 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  63. User:Tnxman307/RfA review added by TN‑X-Man at 00:28, 22 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  64. User:Johnbod/RfA review added by Johnbod (talk) at 01:44, 22 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  65. User:BecauseWhy?/RfA review added by BecauseWhy? (talk) at 04:31, 22 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  66. User:Docboat/RfA review added by docboat (talk) at 05:52, 22 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  67. User:Bushytails/RfA review added by Bushytails (talk) at 06:24, 22 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  68. User:Mattinbgn/RfA review added by Mattinbgn\talk at 08:18, 22 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  69. User:Rmrfstar/RfA review added by Rmrfstar (talk) at 09:41, 22 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  70. User:Bjelleklang/RFA_review added by Bjelleklang - talk Bug Me Bjelleklang - talk Bug Me 10:05, 22 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  71. User:Mizu onna sango15/RfA review added by Mizu onna sango15/水女珊瑚15 at 10:14, 22 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  72. User:Davewild/RfA review added by Davewild (talk) at 10:39, 22 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  73. User:Ddstretch/RFA Review added by  DDStretch  (talk) at 10:42, 22 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  74. User:Bduke/RfA review added by Bduke (talk) at 11:17, 22 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  75. User:Moondyne/RfA review added by Moondyne at 14:08, 22 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  76. User:Lyrl/RfA review added by LyrlTalk C at 14:24, 22 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  77. User:J.delanoy/RfA review added by J.delanoygabsadds at 17:51, 22 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  78. User:Oldelpaso/RfA review added by Oldelpaso (talk) at 18:32, 22 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  79. User:Oreo Priest/RfA review added by Oreo Priest talk at 19:49, 22 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  80. User:Seraphimblade/RfA review added by Seraphimblade Talk to me at 20:30, 22 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  81. User:Arnoutf/RfA review added by Arnoutf (talk) at 20:44, 22 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  82. User:Electrical Experiment/RfA Review added by ElectricalExperiment 21:10, 22 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  83. User:Gmaxwell/RfA review added by Gmaxwell (talk) at 22:44, 22 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  84. User:Legotech/RfA review added by LegoTech·(t)·(c) 01:31, 23 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  85. User:Animum/RfA review added by —Animum (talk) at 02:26, 23 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  86. User:RGTraynor/RfA review added by  RGTraynor  at 04:36, 23 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  87. User:Rocksanddirt/RfA review added a first cut at answers and thoughts by Rocksanddirt (talk) at 04:47, 23 June 2008 (UTC).[reply]
  88. User:Tony1/RfA review added by Tony (talk) at 12:42, 23 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  89. User:HagiMalachi/RfA review added by HagiMalachi (talk) at 13:36, 23 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  90. User:Karanacs/RfA review added by Karanacs (talk) at 14:33, 23 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  91. User:Adrian M. H./RfA review added by Adrian M. H. at 15:46, 23 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  92. User:Quartermaster/RfA review added by Quartermaster (talk) at 16:57, 23 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  93. User:PastorMatt/RfA review added by PastorMatt (talk) at 17:53, 23 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  94. User:Shoteh/RfA review added by Shoteh (talk) at 20:15, 23 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  95. User:UKMan/RfA review added by UKMan (talk) at 21:38, 23 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  96. User:Cdogsimmons/RfA review added by Cdogsimmons (talk) at 22:30, 23 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  97. User:Piotrus/RfA review added by Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| talk at 23:46, 23 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  98. User:JayHenry/RfA review added by JayHenry (talk) at 00:17, 24 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  99. User:Ward3001/RfA review added by Ward3001 (talk) at 00:57, 24 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  100. User:Cremepuff222/RfA review added by --cremepuff222 at 01:43, 24 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  101. User:Savidan/RfA review added by Savidan at 03:02, 24 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  102. User:Daniel Case/RfA review added by Daniel Case (talk) at 03:49, 24 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  103. User:Kainaw/RfA review added by -- kainaw™ at 04:16, 24 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  104. User:Ugen64/RfA review added by ugen64 (talk) at 04:23, 24 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  105. User:Srleffler/RfA review added by Srleffler (talk) at 04:53, 24 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  106. User:Prashanthns/RFAReview added by Prashanthns (talk) at 09:21, 24 June 2008 (UTC) - Incomplete yet[reply]
  107. User:Anthony.bradbury/RfA review --Anthony.bradbury"talk" 09:39, 24 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  108. User:Jimfbleak/RfA review added by jimfbleak (talk) at 10:07, 24 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  109. User:Ferdiaob/RfA review added by ☯Ferdia O'Brien (T)/(C) at 12:38, 24 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  110. User:Parsecboy/RfA review added by Parsecboy (talk) at 12:53, 24 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  111. User:Wildthing61476/RfA review added by Wildthing61476 (talk) at 14:00, 24 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  112. User:Seresin/RfA review added by seresin ( ¡? ) at 20:10, 24 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  113. User:EverSince/RfA review added by EverSince (talk) at 23:53, 24 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  114. User:Scarpy/RfA review added by Scarpy (talk) 00:26, 25 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  115. User:Calliopejen1/RfA review added by Calliopejen1 (talk) at 00:42, 25 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  116. User:XDanielx/RfA review added by — xDanielx T/C\R at 01:22, 25 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  117. User:Vivio Testarossa/Sandboxes/Rfa/Review/Question added by NanohaA'sYuriTalk, My master at 02:16, 25 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  118. User:Dank55/RfA review added by - Dan Dank55 (talk)(mistakes) at 03:11, 25 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  119. User:Jared/RfA review added by Jared (t)  at 03:17, 25 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  120. User:Tswsl1989/RfA review added by Tom::Leave a message at 11:07, 25 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  121. User:MER-C/RfA review added by MER-C at 12:01, 25 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  122. User:Lomn/RfA review added by — Lomn at 14:25, 25 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  123. User:Mdsummermsw/RfA review added by Mdsummermsw (talk) at 18:02, 25 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  124. User:CJ/RfA review added by cj | talk at 18:16, 25 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  125. User:B/RFA review --B (talk) 18:31, 25 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  126. User:Robocoder/RfA review added by -- Robocoder (t|c) at 18:46, 25 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  127. User:Livitup/RfA review added by Livitup (talk) at 18:50, 25 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  128. User:Unschool/RfA review added by Unschool (talk) 20:02, 25 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  129. User:Frank/RfA review added by  Frank  |  talk  at 20:53, 25 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  130. User:SGGH/RfA review added by SGGH speak! at 21:33, 25 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  131. User:Daniel.Cardenas/RfA review added by Daniel.Cardenas (talk) at 22:56, 25 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  132. User:Matilda/RfA review added by Matilda talk at 01:38, 26 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  133. User:Ajcfreak/RfA review added by aJCfreak yAk at 09:04, 26 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  134. User:Angelo.romano/RfA Review added by Angelo (talk) at 10:00, 26 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  135. User:Saoshyant/RfA review added by Ivo talk / contribs (join Project Portugal) at 12:03, 26 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  136. User:Itub/RfA review added by Itub (talk) at 12:35, 26 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  137. User:Bearian/RfaPoll added by Bearian (talk) at 14:09, 26 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  138. User:Psu256/RfA review added by Psu256 (talk) at 21:37, 26 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  139. User:Fahrenheit451/RfA review added by --Fahrenheit451 (talk) 23:10, 26 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  140. User:Kafziel/RfA review added by Kafziel Complaint Department at 07:23, 27 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  141. User:James086/RfA review added by James086 at 11:12, 27 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  142. User:Juliancolton/RfA review added by Juliancolton Tropical Cyclone at 15:46, 27 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  143. User:Pete.Hurd/RfA review added by Pete.Hurd (talk) at 17:40, 27 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  144. User:SilkTork/RfA review added by SilkTork *YES! at 17:42, 27 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  145. User:OhanaUnited/RfA review added by OhanaUnitedTalk page at 18:07, 27 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  146. User:Richard0612/RfA review added by RichardΩ612 Ɣ ɸ at 18:31, 27 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  147. User:Bibliomaniac15/RfA review added by bibliomaniac15 18:40, 27 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  148. User:CredoFromStart/RfA review added by CredoFromStart talk at 19:35, 27 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  149. User:Emir34/RfA review added by Emir34 (talk) at 19:36, 27 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  150. User:LessHeard vanU/RfA review added by LessHeard vanU (talk) at 19:47, 27 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  151. User:Thewellman/RfA review added by Thewellman (talk) 03:17, 28 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  152. User:John/RfA review added by John (talk) at 04:25, 28 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  153. User:Cbramble/RfA_review added by cb (talk) 05:18, 28 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  154. User:TakuyaMurata/RFA Review added by Taku (talk) 12:19, 28 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  155. User:Filll/RfA review added by Filll (talk | wpc) 16:26, 28 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  156. User:Grubber/RfA review added by grubber (talk) at 22:36, 28 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  157. User:Garion96/RfA review added by Garion96 (talk) at 23:19, 28 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  158. User:Richardshusr/RfA_review added by User:Richardshur (User talk:Richardshusr) at 01:26, 29 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  159. User:Fattyjwoods/RfA review added by Fattyjwoods Push my button at 01:28, 29 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  160. User:Davidwr/RfA review added by davidwr/(talk)/(contribs)/(e-mail) at 02:51, 29 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  161. User:Kurykh/RfA review added by Kurykh at 05:56, 29 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  162. User:Croctotheface/RfA review added by Croctotheface (talk) at 06:13, 29 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  163. User:Deepumohan.p/RfA review added by Deepu Mohan.P (talk) at 13:41, 29 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  164. User:Glane23/RfA review added by Glane23 (talk) at 20:08, 29 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  165. User:Treelo/RfA review added by treelo radda at 21:31, 29 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  166. User:Wilhelmina Will/RfA review added by none other than the lady who says I called the Warner sister "Dottie" and lived to tell the tale! (talk) 21:52, 29 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  167. User:Avraham/RfA review added by Avi (talk) at 21:57, 29 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  168. User:HeartofaDog/RfA review added by HeartofaDog (talk) at 01:03, 30 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  169. User:Ruhrfisch/RfA review added by Ruhrfisch ><>°° at 01:27, 30 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  170. User:Athaenara/RfA review added by Athaenara ✉ at 06:30, 30 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  171. User:InDeBiz1/RfA_Review_Answers added by InDeBiz1
  172. User:Lankiveil/RfA review added by Lankiveil (speak to me) at 11:12, 30 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  173. User:Jmcw37/RfA review added by User:Jmcw37 (talk) at 11:16, 30 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  174. User:Xaosflux/RfA review added by — xaosflux Talk at 12:04, 30 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  175. User:Modernist/RfA review added by Modernist (talk) 12:28, 30 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  176. User:GRBerry/RfA review added by GRBerry at 15:25, 30 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  177. User:Ilikepie2221/RfA review added by TALKIN PIE EATER REVIEW ME at 16:06, 30 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  178. User:Pegship/RfA review added by Her Pegship (tis herself) at 16:26, 30 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  179. User:Kmweber/RfA review added by Kurt Weber (Go Colts!) at 16:38, 30 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  180. User:Ukexpat/RfA review added by ukexpat (talk) at 16:48, 30 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  181. User:Headbomb/RfA review added by Headbomb {ταλκ – WP Physics: PotW} at 17:59, 30 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  182. User:Iterator12n/RfA review added by Iterator12n Talk at 19:03, 30 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  183. User:Esprit15d/RfA review added by Esprit15d • talk • contribs at 19:37, 30 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  184. User:Wikidas/RfA_Review added by Wikidās ॐ 20:20, 30 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  185. User:Lifebaka/RfA review added by --lifebaka (Talk - Contribs) 21:09, 30 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  186. User:Hiberniantears/RfA review added by Hiberniantears (talk) at 21:15, 30 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  187. User:Natalya/RfA review added by -- Natalya 21:29, 30 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  188. User:Angusmclellan/RfA review added by Angus McLellan (Talk) at 21:54, 30 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  189. User:Seraphim Whipp/RfA review added by Seraphim♥Whipp at 22:08, 30 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  190. User:Spartaz/RfA review added by Spartaz Humbug! 22:13, 30 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  191. User:SynergeticMaggot/RfA review added by — MaggotSyn at 22:28, 30 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  192. User:GW Simulations/RfA review added by GW_SimulationsUser Page | Talk at 22:37, 30 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  193. User:UberScienceNerd/RfA review added by UberScienceNerd Talk Contributions at 22:53, 30 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  194. User:Enigmaman/RfA review added by Enigma message 23:17, 30 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  195. User:Nn123645/RfA review added by Nn123645 (talk) at 23:18, 30 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  196. User:Cenarium/RfA review added by Cenarium Talk at 23:55, 30 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  197. User:DGG/RfA review added by DGG (talk) at 00:05, 1 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  198. User:Gosgood/RfA review added by Gosgood (talk) at 16:25, 1 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  199. User:IceUnshattered/RfA review added by IceUnshattered (talk) at 20:11, 1 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  200. User:Balloonman/RfA review added by Enigma message 22:21, 1 July 2008 (UTC) (I know the question phase is done, but this should be part of the list)[reply]
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:RfA_Review/Question&oldid=221238604"