Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Georgethedragonslayer: Difference between revisions
→Suspected sockpuppets: rm duplicate |
Comment, marking case as closed (using spihelper.js) |
||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
{{SPIpriorcases}} |
{{SPIpriorcases}} |
||
===11 December 2021=== |
===11 December 2021=== |
||
{{SPI case status| |
{{SPI case status|close}} |
||
====Suspected sockpuppets==== |
====Suspected sockpuppets==== |
||
| Line 36: | Line 36: | ||
*{{Cudecline}} - Two of these accounts are 3k+ edits each, and the third is blocked. I don't think we have socking going on here. -- [[User talk:AmandaNP|<span style="color:white;background-color:#8A2DB8"><b>Amanda</b></span>]] <small>[[User:AmandaNP|(aka DQ)]]</small> 23:13, 11 December 2021 (UTC) |
*{{Cudecline}} - Two of these accounts are 3k+ edits each, and the third is blocked. I don't think we have socking going on here. -- [[User talk:AmandaNP|<span style="color:white;background-color:#8A2DB8"><b>Amanda</b></span>]] <small>[[User:AmandaNP|(aka DQ)]]</small> 23:13, 11 December 2021 (UTC) |
||
{{ping|AmandaNP}}, I am sorry I failed to convince you but there are some strange similarities and coordinated edits in particular few pages that usually do not get much attention from other editors. I do not know how they have managed to avoid the alarm for so long but I have more evidences which I do not want to disclose here. Can I please email you? Thanks. --[[User:Bringtar|Bringtar]] ([[User talk:Bringtar|talk]]) 06:06, 12 December 2021 (UTC) |
{{ping|AmandaNP}}, I am sorry I failed to convince you but there are some strange similarities and coordinated edits in particular few pages that usually do not get much attention from other editors. I do not know how they have managed to avoid the alarm for so long but I have more evidences which I do not want to disclose here. Can I please email you? Thanks. --[[User:Bringtar|Bringtar]] ([[User talk:Bringtar|talk]]) 06:06, 12 December 2021 (UTC) |
||
*Insufficient evidence of socking. Closing. [[User:Bbb23|Bbb23]] ([[User talk:Bbb23|talk]]) 00:07, 20 December 2021 (UTC) |
|||
----<!--- All comments go ABOVE this line, please. --> |
----<!--- All comments go ABOVE this line, please. --> |
||
Revision as of 00:07, 20 December 2021
Georgethedragonslayer
- Georgethedragonslayer (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
11 December 2021
– This SPI case is closed and will be archived shortly by an SPI clerk or checkuser.
Suspected sockpuppets
- Aman.kumar.goel (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
- Gopalam Reddy (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
- Tools: Editor interaction utility • Interaction Timeline • User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
I have no interaction with Georgethedragonslayer before but the way they made their first interaction with me[1] makes it clear that they have interacted with me before which Aman.kumar.goel did[2].
Georgethedragonslayer making same edit[3] as Aman.kumar.goel[4] in the same article and keep doing that:
- Georgethedragonslayer[5] and Aman.kumar.goel[6]
- Georgethedragonslayer[7] and Aman.kumar.goel[8] and repeating until the page is protected.
This has been a pattern which already discussed at ANI and also at BLPN where it was found found to be true.
When I checked Georgethedragonslayer's contributions, I found they have interest in the same topic areas[9] and using similar method to accuse of disruption:
Apart from these, both Georgethedragonslayer and Aman.kumar.goel have strikingly similar edit pattern in some areas which I would like to share via email please.
Georgethedragonslayer restoring the same material[12] added by Gopalam Reddy[13].
Pinging @Tayi Arajakate: and @Fylindfotberserk: who are more familiar with the editing patterns of these editors for their inputs if any. Thanks. Bringtar (talk) 17:33, 11 December 2021 (UTC)
Comments by other users
Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.
Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments
Check declined by a checkuser - Two of these accounts are 3k+ edits each, and the third is blocked. I don't think we have socking going on here. -- Amanda (aka DQ) 23:13, 11 December 2021 (UTC)
@AmandaNP:, I am sorry I failed to convince you but there are some strange similarities and coordinated edits in particular few pages that usually do not get much attention from other editors. I do not know how they have managed to avoid the alarm for so long but I have more evidences which I do not want to disclose here. Can I please email you? Thanks. --Bringtar (talk) 06:06, 12 December 2021 (UTC)
- Insufficient evidence of socking. Closing. Bbb23 (talk) 00:07, 20 December 2021 (UTC)