Jump to content

Wikipedia:Tiers of reliability

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The printable version is no longer supported and may have rendering errors. Please update your browser bookmarks and please use the default browser print function instead.

Tier 1: most reliable

Peer-reviewed publications

  • Peer-reviewed articles in academic journals, e.g. Science [1] or Nature [2]
  • Literature reviews, systematic reviews, and other review articles
  • Peer-reviewed conference papers
  • Examples:
    • Malawey, Victoria (2014). "'Find out what it means to me': Aretha Franklin's gendered re-authoring of Otis Redding's 'Respect'". Popular Music. 33 (2): 185–207. doi:10.1017/S0261143014000270. S2CID 161360928.
    • Lordi, Emily J. (2016). "Souls intact: The soul performances of Audre Lorde, Aretha Franklin, and Nina Simone". Women & Performance. 26 (1): 55–71. doi:10.1080/0740770X.2016.1183981. S2CID 194498055.

Academic books

Tier 2: more reliable

Non-peer-reviewed academic publications

Mass-market books

Highly-reputable international journalism

Tier 3: reliable

Tertiary sources

Other generally reliable news sources

Expert self-published

Tier 4: limited use

Non-expert self-published

Questionable sources

Primary sources

See also

Policies
  • Verifiability (WP:V)
  • No original research (WP:NOR)
Guidelines
Explanatory supplements
General essays
Topic-specific essays
  • Identifying reliable sources (history) (WP:HISTRS)
  • Identifying reliable sources (law) (WP:RSLAW)
  • Identifying reliable sources (science) (WP:SCIRS)
  • Identifying reliable sources (medicine) (WP:MEDRS)
  • Identifying and using style guides (WP:STYLEGUIDES)
  • Using maps and similar sources in Wikipedia articles (WP:MAPCITE)
Other
  • Reliable sources/Noticeboard (WP:RSN)
  • Reliable sources/Perennial sources (WP:RSP)
  • Common knowledge (WP:CK)
  • How to mine a source (WP:MINE)