Draft:Gravity Compressor
 | Review waiting, please be patient.
This may take 8 weeks or more, since drafts are reviewed in no specific order. There are 1,749 pending submissions waiting for review.
Where to get help
How to improve a draft
You can also browse Wikipedia:Featured articles and Wikipedia:Good articles to find examples of Wikipedia's best writing on topics similar to your proposed article. Improving your odds of a speedy review To improve your odds of a faster review, tag your draft with relevant WikiProject tags using the button below. This will let reviewers know a new draft has been submitted in their area of interest. For instance, if you wrote about a female astronomer, you would want to add the Biography, Astronomy, and Women scientists tags. Editor resources
Reviewer tools
|
Submission declined on 23 October 2024 by DoubleGrazing (talk).
Where to get help
How to improve a draft
You can also browse Wikipedia:Featured articles and Wikipedia:Good articles to find examples of Wikipedia's best writing on topics similar to your proposed article. Improving your odds of a speedy review To improve your odds of a faster review, tag your draft with relevant WikiProject tags using the button below. This will let reviewers know a new draft has been submitted in their area of interest. For instance, if you wrote about a female astronomer, you would want to add the Biography, Astronomy, and Women scientists tags. Editor resources
This draft has been resubmitted and is currently awaiting re-review. |  |
| Submission declined on 25 April 2024 by Utopes (talk). This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are: Declined by Utopes 7 months ago.
| |
Comment: The first two sources are secondary, and appear to be okay, but the rest are close primary ones which do not contribute towards notability. We normally require 3+ acceptable sources, so this falls somewhat short of that. DoubleGrazing (talk) 12:22, 23 October 2024 (UTC)
- Comment: No reason to put an external link to enairon within the body of the article. Does not currently contain enough significant, independent coverage as expected of Wikipedia's notability guidelines. Utopes (talk / cont) 22:57, 25 April 2024 (UTC)
A Gravity Compressor is a mechanical device that increases the pressure of a gas by reducing its volume. A Gravity Compressor is a specific type of gas compressor that utilizes a fluid and gravity to compress air. The technology have been developed by a Swedish company called Enairon AB[1][2][3][4], and is marketed under the product name Enairon Gravity Compressor 400 MVSD-7.[5]. Unlike traditional compressors, the Gravity Compressor's design features spirally arranged channels where water acts as pistons, using gravity to compress the air. Some of the first prototypes were developed and demonstrated at Chalmers University of Technology dept. physics during 2017 to 2018 where very good efficiency results were observed[6]. This innovative approach results in a compression process that is both remarkably cool and efficient[7]
References
[edit]- ^ "Article from Dagens industri about the company Enairon and the Gravity Compressor". 3 September 2024. Retrieved 2024-10-23.
- ^ "Article from NyTeknik about the company Enairon and the Gravity Compressor". 2 July 2024. Retrieved 2024-10-23.
- ^ "Article from GWF-GAS about the company Enairon and the Gravity Compressor". 17 October 2024. Retrieved 2024-11-21.
- ^ "Article from Teknisk Ukeblad about the company Enairon and the Gravity Compressor". 2 July 2024. Retrieved 2024-11-21.
- ^ "Enairon Gravity Compressor 400 MVSD-7 Product Page". Retrieved 2024-10-23.
- ^ "Chalmers Research on Gravity Compressors". Retrieved 2024-04-24.
- ^ "Detailed Analysis on Gravity Compressor's Efficiency" (PDF). Retrieved 2024-04-24.
- in-depth (not just passing mentions about the subject)
- reliable
- secondary
- independent of the subject
Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.