Jump to content

User talk:Tayi Arajakate: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Browse history interactively
← Previous editNext edit →
Content deleted Content added
VisualWikitext
Warning: Edit warring on The Wire (India).
Tags: Twinkle Reverted
→June 2021: Replying to Eatcha (using reply-link)
Tag: Reverted
Line 130: Line 130:


If editors continue to revert to their preferred version they are likely to [[Wikipedia:Blocking policy|lose their editing privileges]] on that page. This isn't done to [[WP:BLOCKP|punish an editor, but to prevent the disruption caused by edit warring]]. In particular, editors should be aware of the [[Wikipedia:Edit warring#The three-revert rule|three-revert rule]], which says that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Edit warring on Wikipedia is not acceptable in any amount, and violating the three-revert rule is very likely to result in loss of your editing privileges. Thank you.<!-- Template:uw-ewsoft --> [[User:Eatcha|Eatcha]] 12:44, 16 June 2021 (UTC)
If editors continue to revert to their preferred version they are likely to [[Wikipedia:Blocking policy|lose their editing privileges]] on that page. This isn't done to [[WP:BLOCKP|punish an editor, but to prevent the disruption caused by edit warring]]. In particular, editors should be aware of the [[Wikipedia:Edit warring#The three-revert rule|three-revert rule]], which says that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Edit warring on Wikipedia is not acceptable in any amount, and violating the three-revert rule is very likely to result in loss of your editing privileges. Thank you.<!-- Template:uw-ewsoft --> [[User:Eatcha|Eatcha]] 12:44, 16 June 2021 (UTC)
:{{u|Eatcha}}, the onus for inclusion belongs on you. You immediately restored your addition after the first revert while we were still discussing it on the talk page. I waited for the discussion to end but it just boiled down to you ignoring most of the points raised against the inclusion, which is when I removed it again with an appropriate edit summary. You have restored it again and I don't intend to revert your addition any more but know that if you continue to behave in this manner, it's not me who will be facing loss of editing privileges. <span style="background-color:#B2BEB5;padding:2px 12px 2px 12px;font-size:10px">[[User:Tayi Arajakate|<span style="color:#660000">'''Tayi Arajakate'''</span>]] <sub>[[User talk:Tayi Arajakate|<span style="color:#660000">'''Talk'''</span>]]</sub></span> 12:52, 16 June 2021 (UTC)

Revision as of 12:52, 16 June 2021

Sanctions awareness

The editor is aware of the sanctions in the following topic(s) and should not be given alerts for those areas.

Barnstars
The Invisible Barnstar
For reviewing at least 3 points worth of articles during the January 2022 GAN Backlog Drive, I hereby present you with this barnstar in my capacity as coordinator. Trainsandotherthings (talk) 03:39, 15 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The Guidance Barnstar
Thank you for providing repeated knowledge and guidance as well as help locate valuable resources and information. MehmoodS (talk) 03:17, 15 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The Tireless Contributor Barnstar
Tayi Arajakate, I commend for your extraordinary efforts in improving and transitioning Telangana Rebellion into a good article :) — DaxServer (talk) 17:07, 16 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The Order of the Superior Scribe of Wikipedia   
For your valued work in the July 2021 GAN Backlog Drive, which, in a single month, helped to reduce the backlog by nearly 50%. --Usernameunique (talk) 05:26, 19 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The Cleanup Barnstar
Thank you for cleaning up Komaram Bheem. -- Ab207 (talk) 16:50, 15 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The Original Barnstar
Thank you for your careful and thorough GA review of the article Ada Baker, it is very much appreciated and has improved it considerably. Aussie Article Writer (talk) 04:19, 1 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The Invisible Barnstar
Thank you for completing 2 reviews in the March 2021 backlog drive. Your work helped us reduce the backlog by over 52%. Best, Eddie891 Talk Work 13:44, 21 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The Graphic Designer's Barnstar
Appreciate your excellent work in 2021 Tamil Nadu Legislative Assembly election. SUN EYE 1 14:57, 22 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The Citation Barnstar
Thank you, Tayi Arajakate, for incorporating over 20 high-quality academic publications into the lead section of the Love Jihad article. Your strenuous research efforts have turned this lead section into one of the most well-sourced among all Wikipedia articles. — Newslinger talk 08:51, 11 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Women in Red Women in Asia contest
Tayi Arajakate Third Place December 2020 Congratulations! WomenArtistUpdates (talk) 01:31, 1 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The Women in Red Barnstar
For creating Kavita Devi and subsequently guiding it through an ill-considered AfD, thank you for helping diversify our coverage of important journalists. {{u|Sdkb}} talk 19:00, 2 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Women in Red Women in Asia contest
Tayi Arajakate First Place November 2020 - 26 articles WomenArtistUpdates (talk) 01:16, 1 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The Anti-Vandalism Barnstar
I always see you. Hope I do again. 👀 Firestar464 (talk) 03:55, 27 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The Working Wikipedian's Barnstar
Thank you for conducting 7 reviews in the October 2020 GAN Backlog drive. Your work helped us to reduce the backlog by over 48%. Regards, Eddie891 Talk Work 14:42, 19 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The Barnstar of Diligence
You've gotten through the worst of it, and you're a fully-fledged member of the community now! :D

Congratulations on getting unblocked! –MJL ‐Talk‐☖ 14:44, 7 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The Civility Barnstar
For patiently responding on the talk pages and setting an example on WP:CIVIL. good work. ⋙–DBigXrayᗙ 07:54, 29 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Did you know?

On 23 July 2021, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Mumbai Mirror, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that 200,000 copies of the Mumbai Mirror were distributed on its inaugural print run in 2005, giving it the second-largest circulation in Mumbai? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Mumbai Mirror. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Mumbai Mirror), and if they received a combined total of at least 416.7 views per hour (i.e., 5,000 views in 12 hours or 10,000 in 24), the hook may be added to the statistics page. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

— Maile (talk) 00:02, 23 July 2021 (UTC) [reply]

On 27 January 2021, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Radio Quarantine, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Radio Quarantine was founded in India by a group of professors, directors and PhD students in response to social isolation protocols following the outbreak of the coronavirus pandemic? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Radio Quarantine. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Radio Quarantine), and if they received a combined total of at least 416.7 views per hour (ie, 5,000 views in 12 hours or 10,000 in 24), the hook may be added to the statistics page. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Cwmhiraeth (talk) 12:02, 27 January 2021 (UTC) [reply]

On 20 January 2021, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Sangeeta Isvaran, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that the Bharatanatyam dancer Sangeeta Isvaran works with deprived communities and uses dance and theatre in an effort to bring about social reform? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Sangeeta Isvaran. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Sangeeta Isvaran), and if they received a combined total of at least 416.7 views per hour (ie, 5,000 views in 12 hours or 10,000 in 24), the hook may be added to the statistics page. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

 — Amakuru (talk) 12:02, 20 January 2021 (UTC) [reply]

On 17 January 2021, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Thilagavathi, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that the artist Thilagavathi teaches social interactions and facial expressions to children on the autism spectrum through Therukoothu folk-theatre performances? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Thilagavathi. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Thilagavathi), and if they received a combined total of at least 416.7 views per hour (ie, 5,000 views in 12 hours or 10,000 in 24), the hook may be added to the statistics page. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 12:02, 17 January 2021 (UTC) [reply]

On 12 January 2021, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Swati Thiyagarajan, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that the environmental journalist Swati Thiyagarajan investigated claims of interspecies communication made by the conservationist Anna Breytenbach? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Swati Thiyagarajan. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Swati Thiyagarajan), and if they received a combined total of at least 416.7 views per hour (ie, 5,000 views in 12 hours or 10,000 in 24), the hook may be added to the statistics page. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

— Maile (talk) 00:04, 12 January 2021 (UTC) [reply]

On 8 December 2020, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Salma (writer), which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Salma wrote some of her works while sitting on the toilet, on pieces of paper ripped from calendars and notebooks? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Salma (writer). You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, Salma (writer)), and it may be added to the statistics page if it received over 400 views per hour. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Cwmhiraeth (talk) 00:03, 8 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Salma (writer)

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Salma (writer) you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Whiteguru -- Whiteguru (talk) 06:01, 20 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Salma (writer)

The article Salma (writer) you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Salma (writer) for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Whiteguru -- Whiteguru (talk) 07:01, 20 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

FAR for Vijayanagara Empire

I have nominated Vijayanagara Empire for a featured article review here. Please join the discussion on whether this article meets featured article criteria. Articles are typically reviewed for two weeks. If substantial concerns are not addressed during the review period, the article will be moved to the Featured Article Removal Candidates list for a further period, where editors may declare "Keep" or "Delist" the article's featured status. The instructions for the review process are here. Izno (talk) 20:32, 16 April 2021 (UTC) Izno (talk) 20:38, 16 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

March 2021 GAN Backlog drive

The Invisible Barnstar
Thank you for completing 2 reviews in the March 2021 backlog drive. Your work helped us reduce the backlog by over 52%. Best, Eddie891 Talk Work 13:44, 21 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

May 2021 at Women in Red

Women in Red | May 2021, Volume 7, Issue 5, Numbers 184, 188, 197, 198


Online events:


See also:


Other ways to participate:

Facebook | Instagram | Pinterest | Twitter

--Rosiestep (talk) 21:37, 28 April 2021 (UTC) via MassMessaging[reply]

WikiCup 2021 May newsletter

The second round of the 2021 WikiCup has now finished; it was a high-scoring round and contestants needed 61 points to advance to Round 3. There were some impressive efforts in the round, with the top eight contestants all scoring more than 400 points. A large number of the points came from the 12 featured articles and the 110 good articles achieved in total by contestants, as well as the 216 good article reviews they performed; the GAN backlog drive and the stay-at-home imperative during the COVID-19 pandemic may have been partially responsible for these impressive figures.

Our top scorers in Round 2 were:

  • Botswana The Rambling Man, with 2963 points from three featured articles, 20 featured article reviews, 37 good articles, 73 good article reviews, as well as 22 DYKs.
  • New York (state) Epicgenius, with 1718 points from one featured article, 29 good articles, 16 DYKs and plenty of bonus points.
  • Republic of Venice Bloom6132, with 990 points from 13 DYKs and 64 "In the news" items, mostly recent deaths.
  • Hog Farm, with 834 points from two featured articles, five good articles, 14 featured article reviews and 15 good article reviews.
  • England Gog the Mild, with 524 points from two featured articles and four featured article reviews.
  • England Lee Vilenski, with 501 points from one featured article, three good articles, six featured article reviews and 25 good article reviews.
  • Sammi Brie, with 485 points from four good articles, eight good article reviews and 27 DYKs, on US radio and television stations.
  • Ktin, with 436 points from four good articles, seven DYKs and 11 "In the news" items.

Please remember that DYKs cannot be claimed until they have appeared on the main page. As we enter the third round, any content promoted after the end of Round 2 but before the start of Round 3 can be claimed now, and anything you forgot to claim in Round 2 cannot! Remember too, that you must claim your points within 14 days of "earning" them (except for at the end of each round, when you must claim them before the cut-off date/time). When doing GARs, please make sure that you check that all the GA criteria are fully met.

If you are concerned that your nomination—whether it is at good article nominations, a featured process, or anything else—will not receive the necessary reviews, please list it on Wikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews Needed (remember to remove your listing when no longer required). Questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup, and the judges are reachable on their talk pages or by email. If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove yourself from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. Judges: Sturmvogel 66 (talk) and Cwmhiraeth MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 10:28, 2 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

June 2021 at Women in Red

Women in Red | June 2021, Volume 7, Issue 6, Numbers 184, 188, 196, 199, 200, 201


Online events:


Other ways to participate:

Facebook | Instagram | Pinterest | Twitter

--Rosiestep (talk) 18:51, 28 May 2021 (UTC) via MassMessaging[reply]

Add Semi-Protection

Hi, The Page Asianet Semi-protection is ending on 31 may. Please Re-Add Semi Protection to This page. EditzIndia (talk) 10:02, 31 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

EditzIndia, the correct place to make such requests is on Wikipedia:Requests for page protection. Tayi Arajakate Talk 10:10, 31 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Feedback request: Politics, government, and law request for comment

Your feedback is requested at Talk:People's Mujahedin of Iran on a "Politics, government, and law" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 07:31, 14 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi?

Hi there. Can I interest you in some temporary semiprotection of this page? The socking is strong in your "friends". Bishonen | tålk 08:55, 14 June 2021 (UTC).[reply]

Bishonen, yes! I'd like that. Tayi Arajakate Talk 09:37, 14 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Semi'd for a week. Just let me know if you'd like it extended, or shortened. Bishonen | tålk 11:15, 14 June 2021 (UTC).[reply]
Bishonen, hey so would it be possible to revdel(?) this account's username in their contributions? It's just a bunch of expletives in Hindi after my username. Tayi Arajakate Talk 07:58, 15 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Sure. What a lovely guy. Bishonen | tålk 08:29, 15 June 2021 (UTC).[reply]
Ikr, so charming! Tayi Arajakate Talk 08:39, 15 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

June 2021

Information icon Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. You appear to be repeatedly reverting or undoing other editors' contributions at The Wire (India). Although this may seem necessary to protect your preferred version of a page, on Wikipedia this is known as "edit warring" and is usually seen as obstructing the normal editing process, as it often creates animosity between editors. Instead of reverting, please discuss the situation with the editor(s) involved and try to reach a consensus on the talk page.

If editors continue to revert to their preferred version they are likely to lose their editing privileges on that page. This isn't done to punish an editor, but to prevent the disruption caused by edit warring. In particular, editors should be aware of the three-revert rule, which says that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Edit warring on Wikipedia is not acceptable in any amount, and violating the three-revert rule is very likely to result in loss of your editing privileges. Thank you. Eatcha 12:44, 16 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Eatcha, the onus for inclusion belongs on you. You immediately restored your addition after the first revert while we were still discussing it on the talk page. I waited for the discussion to end but it just boiled down to you ignoring most of the points raised against the inclusion, which is when I removed it again with an appropriate edit summary. You have restored it again and I don't intend to revert your addition any more but know that if you continue to behave in this manner, it's not me who will be facing loss of editing privileges. Tayi Arajakate Talk 12:52, 16 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Tayi_Arajakate&oldid=1028861067"