Talk:Ive (group)
This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
This article has not yet been rated on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
|
This page is not a forum for general discussion about Ive (group). Any such comments may be removed or refactored. Please limit discussion to improvement of this article. You may wish to ask factual questions about Ive (group) at the Reference desk. |
Requested move 21 February 2022
- The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
The result of the move request was: (non-admin closure) Not moved per clear consensus that it's WP:RECENTISM. — Paper9oll (🔔 • 📝) 04:22, 28 February 2022 (UTC)
– The group is the WP:PRIMARYTOPIC. Btspurplegalaxy 🗩 🖉 04:52, 21 February 2022 (UTC)
SupportOpposepageview statistics seem to back up the rationaleI am mistaken, others have pointed out WP:RECENTISM Slashlefty (talk) 08:53, 22 February 2022 (UTC)- Oppose. Definitely no primary topic by long-term significance. Just WP:RECENTISM. They've only been around for three months. -- Necrothesp (talk) 14:24, 23 February 2022 (UTC)
- Support All search results for "Ive" on Google and Bing refers to this group. SnowKang (talk) 16:18, 23 February 2022 (UTC)
- Oppose. Very common term, typical entertainment/cultural Wikipedia:Recentism for Kpop groups. Evaders99 (talk) 21:41, 23 February 2022 (UTC)
- Oppose. Massively recent. Searching Google and Bing gives entertainment results. In WP:RS no primary topic by long-term significance In ictu oculi (talk) 08:05, 26 February 2022 (UTC)
is it okay for "Love Dive" to be added even though it hasn't been released yet?
should the "Love Dive" album be removed? it hasn't come out yet blueskies (talk) 15:16, 18 March 2022 (UTC)
- It doesn't have to be removed since it's been confirmed and there is an official release date. Btspurplegalaxy 🗩 🖉 19:16, 18 March 2022 (UTC)
Confirmed Position
Starship Entertainment in a article via Naver confirmed member Gaeul as their "Main Dancer" the translation of korean to english goes
"Autumn is the main dancer of certainty. She made a mark with her powerful performance that contrasted with her innocent appearance. Even in group dance, they dominated the stage with neat dance lines.” The text says Autumn because Gaeul means Autumn in Korean."
Source:https://n.news.naver.com/entertain/article/433/0000079097 Moonlight Entm (talk) 02:20, 9 April 2022 (UTC)
Requested move 28 October 2022
It has been proposed in this section that Ive (group) be renamed and moved to Ive (South Korean group). A bot will list this discussion on the requested moves current discussions subpage within an hour of this tag being placed. The discussion may be closed 7 days after being opened, if consensus has been reached (see the closing instructions). Please base arguments on article title policy, and keep discussion succinct and civil. Please use {{subst:requested move}} . Do not use {{requested move/dated}} directly. |
Ive (group) → Ive (South Korean group) – avoid confusion with the Japanese group of the same name (I've Sound or I've for short) RapMonstaXY (talk) 00:37, 28 October 2022 (UTC)
- Strongly oppose as nowhere is the similarities of the name even close enough to have any form of confusion. Furthermore, the article title was already disambiguated itself and it's not a Japanese music group but a Japanese music production group/company. — Paper9oll (🔔 • 📝) 02:28, 28 October 2022 (UTC)
- Oppose per SMALLDIFFERENCES.--Ortizesp (talk) 03:53, 28 October 2022 (UTC)
- Support I've (South Korean group) and I've (Japanese group) completely indistinguishable. In ictu oculi (talk) 19:34, 28 October 2022 (UTC)
- @In ictu oculi Fyi, "I've" isn't the correct name for Ive (group), they have never used that at all hence I'm not sure why that redirect was even created when it wasn't correct nor mentioned to begin. In addition, official sources and secondary reliable sources also doesn't uses that incorrect name. — Paper9oll (🔔 • 📝) 00:19, 29 October 2022 (UTC)
- Oppose per what Paper9oll stated. Btspurplegalaxy 💬 🖊️ 19:39, 28 October 2022 (UTC)
- Oppose The difference is insignificant. Editorkamran (talk) 06:35, 30 October 2022 (UTC)
- Oppose per above. ɴᴋᴏɴ21 ❯❯❯ talk 18:58, 31 October 2022 (UTC)
- Biography articles of living people
- C-Class biography articles
- C-Class biography (musicians) articles
- Low-importance biography (musicians) articles
- Musicians work group articles
- WikiProject Biography articles
- C-Class Korea-related articles
- Low-importance Korea-related articles
- WikiProject Korea popular culture working group
- WikiProject Korea articles
- C-Class Women in music articles
- Low-importance Women in music articles
- WikiProject Women in Music articles
- Requested moves