Jump to content

Talk:Kenny Demens/GA2

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

GA Review

[edit]

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.


GA toolbox
Reviewing

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Nominator: TonyTheTiger (talk · contribs)

Reviewer: AirshipJungleman29 (talk · contribs) 21:35, 23 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]


This article was quickfailed earlier today with the rationale that this was just a short collection of statistics. It was renominated with the rationale "This guy is a special teams player and got minimal press coverage" after making a series of superficial edits, including adding who the subject's best friend was. In between the failing and the renomination, the nominator was informed about his access to WP:TWL, but has seemingly chosen to immediately forget about it. This is a shame, as there are numerous sources available there which provide in-depth, significant coverage of the subject. I provide a selection of titles below:

  • Snyder, Mark; Fri 31 August 2012, page B11. "Senior LB Demens draws attention for many reasons"
  • Snyder, Mark; Fri 19 October 2012, page B6. "U-M linebacker Demens back to making plays, leading"
  • Snyder, Mark; Sat 16 February 2013, Page B3. "Pumped for the NFL Draft"
  • Birkett, Dave; Thu 18 April 2013, Page C4. "U-M's Demens: A shot at the NFL"
  • Facher, Lev; Sun 8 May 2016, Page C2. "Former LB Demnens honors moms at event"

The nominator's assertion that the subject "got minimal press coverage" is clearly false. Thus, the issues remaining from a previous GA review have not been addressed. The nominator will find, should they choose to read the relevant page, that issues remaining from a prior GA review is a WP:QUICKFAIL criterion. I am thus quickfailing this nomination, and requesting the nominator to do their damn job before nominating it a third time. ~~ AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 21:35, 23 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.