Talk:Kimberley points

Archaeology Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Archaeology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Archaeology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ArchaeologyWikipedia:WikiProject ArchaeologyTemplate:WikiProject ArchaeologyArchaeology articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

	Australia portal Kimberley points is within the scope of WikiProject Australia, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Australia and Australia-related topics. If you would like to participate, visit the project page.AustraliaWikipedia:WikiProject AustraliaTemplate:WikiProject AustraliaAustralia articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Indigenous peoples of Australia (assessed as Mid-importance).
	Need help improving this article? Ask a Librarian^{What's this?} at the National Library of Australia.
	The Wikimedia Australia chapter can be contacted via email to helpwikimedia.org.au for non-editorial assistance.

akerman's points

Akerman Kim and Bindon, Peter. 1995.Dentate and related stone biface points from Northern Australia.

The Beagle. Records of the Museums and Art Galleries of the Northern Territory. 12:89-99.

Akerman, Kim., Fullagar, Richard and van Gijn, Annelou. 2002. Weapons and Wunan: production, function and exchange of Kimberley points.Aboriginal Studies 2002/1:13-42.

Akerman, Kim. 2008.‘Missing the Point’ or ‘What to Believe – the Theory or the Data’.

Rationales for the Production of Kimberley Points. Aboriginal Studies 2008/2:70-79. AIATSIS Canberra.