This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Chemistry, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of chemistry on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ChemistryWikipedia:WikiProject ChemistryTemplate:WikiProject ChemistryChemistry articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Minnesota, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to Minnesota on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MinnesotaWikipedia:WikiProject MinnesotaTemplate:WikiProject MinnesotaMinnesota articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions.
Although I don't want to write the article for the original editor a cursory Google search turns up various hits for Mr. Amundson including some referring to him as the "father of chemical engineering." Let's hope the editor follows up the page creation with the relevant supporting info. He sounds like a notable person. Rob Banzai (talk) 21:34, 26 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Clearly you didn't follow Wikipedia's neutral point of view, verifiability, or avoid weasel words standards. This article is chock full of examples of how NOT to write a Wikipedia biography. It's completely biased, slanted, one-sided, and sounds like a glowing half-advertisement/half-biography. Please review Wikipedia policy before "slapping together" anything else. --Charlesreid1 (talk) 05:13, 6 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
This biography is terribly written and (as per the comment above) doesn't follow any of the Wikipedia standards for articles (let alone biographies). It's completely biased, nowhere close to having a neutral point of view, and full of unverified claims. The claims that actually do cite references cite unreliable references. Article is badly in need of major overhaul. --Charlesreid1 (talk) 05:13, 6 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]