The contentious topics procedure applies to this page. This page is related to post-1992 politics of the United States and closely related people, which has been designated as a contentious topic.
This article is written in American English, which has its own spelling conventions (color, defense, traveled) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus.
This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourcedmust be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.
This page is about a politician who is running for office or has recently run for office, is in office and campaigning for re-election, or is involved in some current political conflict or controversy. For that reason, this article is at increased risk of biased editing, talk-page trolling, and simple vandalism.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Florida. If you would like to join us, please visit the project page; if you have any questions, please consult the FAQ.FloridaWikipedia:WikiProject FloridaTemplate:WikiProject FloridaFlorida articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Conservatism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of conservatism on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ConservatismWikipedia:WikiProject ConservatismTemplate:WikiProject ConservatismConservatism articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject U.S. Congress, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the United States Congress on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.U.S. CongressWikipedia:WikiProject U.S. CongressTemplate:WikiProject U.S. CongressU.S. Congress articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Politics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of politics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PoliticsWikipedia:WikiProject PoliticsTemplate:WikiProject Politicspolitics articles
Jordan Boyd (June 15, 2021). "Wikipedia's Quiet, Big-Tech-Funded Grip On Internet Knowledge Gives It Too Much Power". The Federalist. Archived from the original on June 20, 2023. Retrieved June 16, 2021. In one recent example, New York Gov. Andrew Cuomo, who is under federal and state investigation for mishandling the COVID-19 pandemic and growing list of scandals, is described on his Wikipedia page in a positive light while Florida Gov. Ron DeSantis, a potential GOP frontrunner for the 2024 presidential election, is painted as a partisan hack who ignored the science.{{cite news}}: |archive-date= / |archive-url= timestamp mismatch; May 22, 2023 suggested (help)
Why is there such a big emphasis on the passage of the Parental Rights in Education Act? Why is it mentioned in the top. There is plenty of bills, that have been passed during DeSantis's tenure, and this emphasis on the Parental Right Act is confusing. I'm proposing to delete that part Udehbwuh (talk) 15:58, 30 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Please, provide reliable sources, that would confirm, that the bill is the most significant, that was passed during DeSantis's tenure. Udehbwuh (talk) 09:41, 1 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The amount of sources covering it is enough to show how significant it was, and if you can find similarly wide coverage of other bills feel free to add more sources. Harryhenry1 (talk) 10:05, 1 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request.
Change "Various writers have predicted that he could defeat Trump or said that he is preferable to Trump..." to "Various writers predicted that he could defeat Trump or said that he was preferable to Trump...".
I think that this article should be locked and edited only by moderators. It will most likely be griefed. 1q9w — Preceding undated comment added 22:06, 23 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
It's arguable, but Ron DeSantis met her under her maiden name. Grammatically and contextually, I favor using her maiden name in that context. ~ Pbritti (talk) 14:51, 10 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Done. Thank you, Ouroboros777. ~ Pbritti (talk) 19:16, 22 January 2024 (UTC)