Jump to content

Talk:Power Instinct

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
(Redirected from Talk:Solis R8000)

Family tree

[edit]

Should I add a section for the family tree or that would be irrelevant?

I think in such a case it would be best to give it it's own article and add it to the PI characters template under "Misc". :)
If possible, maybe that's what the Minor Characters section in the template can be changed to, and the rest of the minor character links be removed (other than the main link itself). Ralf Loire 03:13, 14 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Power Instinct Legends remixed themes

[edit]

Should we include the themes of the majority of the characters in PI Legends that are remixes of their PI2 themes in their articles? I'm just wondering about that and all. No big deal if not. --Ralf Loire (Annoy) 21:24, 7 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Characters

[edit]

You'd think that if the guy felt it necessary to remove all the info on the characters, he'd have at least put up a section of them on the main article... what an uncaring simp!

Somebody here better take care of it and take care of it good, I think it's very necessary to at least add some small detail about them. 66.143.32.86 22:07, 10 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Agreed. At least form a list of the characters would be nice. ZeroGiga 03:18, 12 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

http://es.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anexo:Personajes_de_Power_Instinct Spanish Wikipedia already did this. Why souldn't be applied here? --190.22.13.207 (talk) 17:38, 20 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Pwrinst2.png

[edit]

Image:Pwrinst2.png is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 06:07, 21 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Bonnounokaiho.png

[edit]

Image:Bonnounokaiho.png is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 04:14, 12 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Groovef.png

[edit]

Image:Groovef.png is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 23:51, 13 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

File:Plegends.png Nominated for speedy Deletion

[edit]

An image used in this article, File:Plegends.png, has been nominated for speedy deletion for the following reason: Wikipedia files with no non-free use rationale as of 1 December 2011

What should I do?

Don't panic; you should have time to contest the deletion (although please review deletion guidelines before doing so). The best way to contest this form of deletion is by posting on the image talk page.

  • If the image is non-free then you may need to provide a fair use rationale
  • If the image isn't freely licensed and there is no fair use rationale, then it cannot be uploaded or used.
  • If the image has already been deleted you may want to try Deletion Review

This notification is provided by a Bot --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 23:57, 1 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Notes

[edit]

Recently deleted the notes section; if anyone has the original sources, they may be used to provide in-line citations:

  • Power Instinct Manual
  • Goketsuji Ichizoku Soundtrack Manual
  • Goketsuji Ichizoku 2 Game Manual
  • Gouketsiji Ichizoku 2 Soundtrack Manual
  • Groove on Fight guide book
  • Groove on Fight Soundtrack Manual
  • Gouketsuji Ichizoku The CD-ROM
  • Noise Factory's site

--Jtalledo (talk) 16:48, 14 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Power Instinct. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 19:51, 6 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Minor edits in names and use of "ō" vs "ou" vs "o"

[edit]

Updated names to have a more uniform format.

"ō" vs "ou" vs "o" (~おう) Since the article originally used "Gōketsuji", made some edits so this word used "ō" throughout the article. However, names such as Oume, Oyama Kintaro, Saizo, Buntaro, etc. were kept with just an "o" because they are normally written using just an "o" instead of " ō" or "ou" (example, Jotaro Kujo). This is clarified in the Japanese pronunciation. Exception is Hanakouji, since I've seen it written like this somewhere else (not sure where), and gives a sense of "elegance" instead of a plain "Hanakoji". Feel free to edit it anyway. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 189.180.16.112 (talk) 03:09, 15 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]