Talk:Typhoon Omar

Typhoon Omar is a featured article; it (or a previous version of it) has been identified as one of the best articles produced by the Wikipedia community. Even so, if you can update or improve it, please do so.

This article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page as Today's featured article on December 4, 2017.

Article milestones
Date	Process	Result
April 26, 2015	Good article nominee	Listed
September 20, 2015	Featured article candidate	Promoted

Current status: Featured article

Weather: Tropical / Western Pacific Mid‑importance

	Weather portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Weather, which collaborates on weather and related subjects on Wikipedia. To participate, help improve this article or visit the project page for details. Articles Requested Project Resources Become a Member Project Talk Assessment A-Class Alerts WeatherWikipedia:WikiProject WeatherTemplate:WikiProject WeatherWeather articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
	Tropical cyclones portal This article is supported by WikiProject Tropical cyclones (assessed as Mid-importance).
	This article is supported by the Pacific typhoon work group (assessed as Mid-importance).

Micronesia: Guam High‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Micronesia, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Micronesia on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MicronesiaWikipedia:WikiProject MicronesiaTemplate:WikiProject MicronesiaMicronesia articles
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Guam work group (assessed as High-importance).
	It is requested that an a map be included in this article to improve its quality.

Todo

More intro and impact. Jdorje 19:39, 11 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

GA Review

This review is transcluded from Talk:Typhoon Omar/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Wilhelmina Will (talk · contribs) 22:43, 15 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

GA criteria

Well-written:

With a few minor grammatical corrections made, I am content the article complies with MOS policies on grammar, prose and structure. "Carry me down, carry me down; carry me down into the wiki!" (talk) 22:50, 26 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

(a) the prose is clear, concise, and understandable to an appropriately broad audience; spelling and grammar are correct

(b) it complies with the Manual of Style guidelines for lead sections, layout, words to watch, fiction, and list incorporation

Verifiable with no original research:

The article is well-referenced; it makes frequent use of the sources in its bibliography, all of which seem reliable, and does not contain anything resembling original research. "Carry me down, carry me down; carry me down into the wiki!" (talk) 22:49, 26 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

(a) it contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with the layout style guideline

(b) reliable sources are cited inline. All content that could reasonably be challenged, except for plot summaries and that which summarizes cited content elsewhere in the article, must be cited no later than the end of the paragraph (or line if the content is not in prose)

(c) it contains no original research

Broad in its coverage:

The article covers all encyclopedically relevant aspects of the topic in a thorough and balanced manner. "Carry me down, carry me down; carry me down into the wiki!" (talk) 22:48, 26 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

(a) it addresses the main aspects of the topic

(b) it stays focused on the topic without going into unnecessary detail (see summary style)

Neutral: it represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each.

The article's approach to its topic is void of bias. "Carry me down, carry me down; carry me down into the wiki!" (talk) 22:47, 26 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Stable: it does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute.

The revision history indicates that the article has not endured any disruptive editing since at least late 2008. "Carry me down, carry me down; carry me down into the wiki!" (talk) 07:40, 26 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Illustrated, if possible, by media such as images, video, or audio:

All four images presently used in the article are relevant for illustration, and as they are all licensed in the public domain, fair use is not an issue. "Carry me down, carry me down; carry me down into the wiki!" (talk) 07:44, 26 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

(a) media are tagged with their copyright statuses, and valid non-free use rationales are provided for non-free content

(b) media are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions

Thanks for the review so far. ♫ Hurricanehink (talk) 20:32, 20 April 2015 (UTC) After reading over the article and making a few minor corrections, I am content it satisfies the GA criteria. Congratulations! "Carry me down, carry me down; carry me down into the wiki!" (talk) 22:51, 26 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]