This template is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions.
This template is within the scope of WikiProject Trains, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to rail transport on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion. See also: WikiProject Trains to do list and the Trains Portal.TrainsWikipedia:WikiProject TrainsTemplate:WikiProject Trainsrail transport
This template is within the scope of the Greater Boston Public Transit WikiProject, a collaborative effort to improve Wikipedia's coverage of public transportation in the Greater Boston metropolitan area. If you would like to participate, you can visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks.Greater Boston Public TransitWikipedia:WikiProject Greater Boston Public TransitTemplate:WikiProject Greater Boston Public TransitGreater Boston Public Transit
@Useddenim: Why do you object to clarifying which stations are closed? While most elements of RDTs are fairly intuitive even to readers not very familiar with the subject matter, it is not necessarily obvious that the lighter dot indicates a closed station. That's particularly true at the small scale of the HST dots: with less-than-ideal contrast such as a screen viewed outdoors, the difference in shading is difficult to notice. Additionally, not all the closed stations have articles yet, so it's not always possible for the reader to click on the article to see that it's closed. Given all that, I think it's a net benefit to the reader with minimal downside. Pi.1415926535 (talk) 06:09, 23 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
For the same reason that WP:OVERCAT exists, although you raise a valid point for the cases where a linked page doesn't exists. This issue was debated at (I think) WP:UKRAIL quite a number of years ago and the consensus was "less is more", i.e. only add additional notation to stations where it is needed (usually when there is more than one of the same name due to either relocation or competing companies, but also for missing pages). Useddenim (talk) 13:49, 23 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I agree that the diagram is confusing and borderline ambiguous for most readers without labels for closed stations. It's also consistent with templates for other US rail lines, that either list the year a station closed or omit closed stations entirely. QuincyMorgan (talk) 17:23, 23 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
