User talk:Bon courage

If you are here to discuss something about an article's content then please, to maximize consensus, comment on that article's Talk page and not here.

This is Bon courage's talk page, where you can send him messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Archives: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12

Controversial Topics

YEs, I am trying to be as respectful in my comments as I can. Please let me know if I have not adhered to the rules of wikipedia. Troy Kelley Tdkelley1 16:16, 17 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Francine Shapiro

Further comments to Talk:Francine Shapiro, in English. Bon courage (talk) 08:39, 19 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Hello, it's not spam, it's his conference in Bali filmed by a professional, why did you remove it without even discussing it?

Laurent Gay (talk) 08:14, 19 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Because it looks spammy. Who is the "his" of "his conference"? Bon courage (talk) 08:16, 19 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

J'avoue le début de la conf est un peu brut, je vais voir avec Ghylaine Manet (https://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Utilisateur:Laurent_Gay/Brouillon-Manet) si il y a une autre partie mais je ne pense pas, les conférences c'est en général 30mn, c'est Ghylaine qui a assisté a sa conférence et elle a payé un professionnel qui l'a filmé. Apres la vidéo je peux charger la video sur commons wiki si ca vous arrange. Laurent Gay (talk) 08:34, 19 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Bof. There is no indication this apparently random amateur video on a commercial site is reputably published, relevant or even legal. And Francine Shapiro was not a man. Please make any further comments at Talk:Francine Shapiro. Bon courage (talk) 08:38, 19 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Repeat edit and removal of information and reputable sources - Eurycoma Longifolia

Hi there, I would like to clarify on what basis you remove new information and reputable citations referencing ACTUAL clinical trials which have been conducted on the topic? Various journal articles have been cited here from the National Center for Biotechnology Information with credible data and conclusions. I'm confused as to how these sources are considered "fringe," my friend. I will be reverting your revision once again, feel free to add some "non-fringe" sources to the article please. Parker.Josh (talk) 14:26, 24 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there! Clinical trials are not generally reliable for biomedical content; please see WP:MEDRS. CAM journals like EBCAM are not usable for anything much on Wikipedia. Bon courage (talk) 14:52, 24 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Please note there are additional credited sources that substantiate the information. Please see:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4085925/ https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4085925/. New information and research should be included and updated on such topics surely? Parker.Josh (talk) 15:03, 24 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Not when it's weak/fake from poor sources. Wikipedia reflects accepted knowledge from reliable sources. Your intent to edit war is noted. Bon courage (talk) 15:07, 24 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

"My intend to edit war" displays your intentions on this platform. You are welcome to read the citations I have provided and inform yourself on the topic. As far as your "edit war" goes, you can do that on your own. Add value to the topic or not. That's my concern. Parker.Josh (talk) 15:31, 24 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Roseto effect

I'm not sure if this is a medical or sociological thing. I recall reading about it in Outliers, the book by Malcolm Gladwell. There are also a few medical sources and more. I didn't want to deprod the article with discussion first, but can you reconsider your own proposed deletion? Bearian (talk) 13:02, 25 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

It might be an idea to ask at WT:MED. My concern is there are apparently no WP:MEDRS sources on this supposed biomedical phenomenon. Bon courage (talk) 13:32, 25 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]