User talk:Pmpgl

Welcome!

Hello, Pmpgl, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

You may also want to complete the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit the Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! RJFJR (talk) 02:14, 14 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you, RJFJR! pgpgl (talk) 01:01, 17 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Pmpgl (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Unfortunately I'm not able to edit most of the times I use a VPN provider, even if I'm logged in Wikipedia. For privacy reasons I prefer to use VPN services. Would it be possible to lift these blocks, provided I'm logged in? Cheers

Decline reason:

I am sorry, but we are unable to lift blocks for VPN providers or other anonymizing proxies. SQL ^{Query me!} 01:52, 26 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Wikipedia policy

Please adhere to Wikipedia policy, in particular WP:BRD. IAmAnEditor (talk) 23:38, 16 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Sure, please adhere to Wikipedia policy, too, in particular WP:EMP (saying "I'm right, you're wrong" is deprecated), WP:FIXED (saying "You must discuss before editing this page" is deprecated), and Wikipedia:V: "Wikipedia is supposed to be a collection of sourced material, not indiscriminate information". pgpgl (talk) 00:10, 17 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Spoiler warnings on Wikipedia

Hello Pmpgl,

There is a Wikipedia policy on spoiler warnings. See WP:SPOILER for more info. Caidh (talk) 16:02, 17 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi again Pmpgl,

I think having detail at the top of the page - not specifically using the term spoiler or warning - but mentioning that details from all books would occur. Something like "This page contains information from all published books in the series" might work. You might want to bring it up on the talk page for the specific Wheel of Time page though as there are more experienced editors than I who may have a suggestion on this. Caidh (talk) 20:12, 17 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

UTRS

UTRS appeal #97173 has been declined. JBW (talk) 16:22, 24 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]