Jump to content

User talk:SlimVirgin/History 2: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Footnotes: Lockerbie photo
Farhansher (talk | contribs)
Line 125: Line 125:


--[[User:Wgfinley|Wgfinley]] 18:38, 1 January 2006 (UTC)
--[[User:Wgfinley|Wgfinley]] 18:38, 1 January 2006 (UTC)

==Proposed merge==
I propose merging [[Islamist terrorism]] into [[Militant Islam]] , [[Dar al-Harb]] into [[Dar al Islam]] & [[Offensive jihad]] into [[Combative jihad]], please comment if you have thoughts on the matter . Thanks . [[user:Farhansher|<font color="blueviolet">'''F.a.y.'''</font>]]<sup>[[user talk:Farhansher|<font color="darkorange">تبادله خيال</font>]]</sup> <small><sup><sup>[[Special:Contributions/Farhansher|<font color="slategray">'''''/c'''''</font>]]</sup></sup></small> 21:02, 1 January 2006 (UTC)

Revision as of 21:19, 1 January 2006

Imagine a world in which every single person on the planet is given free access to the sum of all human knowledge. That's what we're doing. — Jimbo Wales [1]

Education is the ability to listen to almost anything without losing your temper. — Robert Frost


And in the event that you're here with a personal attack: "Any time something is written against me, I not only share the sentiment but feel I could do the job far better myself. Perhaps I should advise would-be enemies to send me their grievances beforehand, with full assurance that they will receive my every aid and support."
Jorge Luis Borges


Archive 1 Archive 2 Archive 3 Archive 4 Archive 5 Archive 6 Archive 7 Archive 8 Archive 9 Archive 10 Archive 11 Archive 12 Archive 13 Archive 14 Archive 15 Archive 16 Archive 17 Archive 18 Archive 19 Archive 20 Archive 21 Archive 22 Archive 23

(responding to your comments on Wikipedia_talk:Reliable_sources#Blogs) Have you seen the Wikibooks:errata project? --DavidCary 07:55, 30 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Vegan cakes for you!

Hi Slim, with all you've been going through recently, I wanted to give you an award to tell you how valued and needed you are here. So, here are three honorary (and delicious!) vegan cakes that I hope help get this sentiment across. Babajobu 21:40, 30 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

File:Cake.JPG
Vegan cakes for Slim Virgin, one of Wikipedia's very best and most needed editors

Poetlister

Hi have you managed to read my message about this above? I would appreciate your thoughts on my message to Ambi and my rfc on Antidote. Thanks Arniep 21:54, 30 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Happy New Year

(Feliz Año Nuevo)


Happy New Year from Tony the Marine

I wish you all the happiness in the world and remember, if an injustice is ever committed against you or one of your articles, I will always be by your side. Your friend Tony the Marine

Have a very happy new year and I echo Tony the Marine's sentiments.--Dakota ~ ε 18:26, 31 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your RFA support

Hi SlimVirgin/History 2! I've just come back from a very refreshing wikibreak, so here is a belated thanks for your support in my successful RFA. I'm sure you're used to these, so thanks again, and have a happy new year (if that's your kind of thing)! jnothman talk 17:23, 31 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Happy New Year

For last year's words belong to last year's language
And next year's words await another voice.
And to make an end is to make a beginning.
T.S. Eliot, "Little Gidding"
Happy New Year! ≈ jossi ≈ t@ 20:24, 31 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Should have told you

I moved the page back. BYT 22:30, 31 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Islamofascism (term) page move - my opinion, CC'd from maru's talk page

SlimVirgin asked me to look into this issue as an uninvolved party and offer my opinion. Without getting in to the specific merits of whether or not I personally think the page "should" have been renamed, I think this is a case of biting the oldies. Page moves are typically doable by anyone, and the 60% guideline on WP:RM is phrased somewhat loosely. The whole point is that if you end up on WP:RM, the move is controversial. The stakes are, frankly, low here — the substance of the article is unchanged — and getting worked up over a few percent one way or the other seems to me to be missing the forest for the trees. It seems wrong to me that we should give an admin less discretion in deciding how to close a page move discussion than we do when closing an article deletion discussion.

I think Marudubshinki should be encouraged to close out the discussion however he thinks appropriate, and people should be encouraged to redirect their energy into improving the article and making sure it stays properly focused, rather than fretting over the semiotics of whether or not a parenthesized word appears in the article title.

Hope this helps. Looking forward to the hate mail.

Regards, Nandesuka 23:05, 31 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Move to delete 99% of all Lists and Categories of Jews: Sixteen reasons why this should become a fixed Wikipedia policy

Hello SlimVirgin: Finally, a discussion of possible policy changes has begun. Please see Wikipedia:Centralized discussion/Lists by religion-ethnicity and profession#Move to delete 99% of all Lists and Categories of Jews: Sixteen reasons why this should become a fixed Wikipedia policy. I have posted all sixteen points we formulated. Thank you for your input and help. Best wishes for a Happy and Prosperous 2006! IZAK 12:54, 1 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Footnotes

Can you look at Oscar Neebe and tell me if I am using the most recent style of footnotes. I am about to go through the obscure biographies I have initiated, and am the only contributer and add footnotes, but before I start I need a little help from somone with more experience. --Richard Arthur Norton (1958- ) 17:27, 1 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Warning sign
This image may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:AbuNidalLockerbie.jpg. I notice the image page currently doesn't specify who created the image, so the copyright status is therefore unclear. If you have not created the image yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the image on Wikipedia (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the image yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page.

If the image also doesn't have a copyright tag then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture then you can use {{GFDL}} to release it under the GFDL. If you can claim fair use use {{fairusein|article name}} or {{fairuse}}. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other images, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find a list of image pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you.

I checked the investigation report [2] and this photo isn't in it anywhere. The source website has no source information on the photograph. It's source is unknown and likely not a free image.

--Wgfinley 18:38, 1 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed merge

I propose merging Islamist terrorism into Militant Islam , Dar al-Harb into Dar al Islam & Offensive jihad into Combative jihad, please comment if you have thoughts on the matter . Thanks . F.a.y.تبادله خيال /c 21:02, 1 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]