User talk:Walking Spellcheck

Welcome!

Hello, Walking Spellcheck, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of your recent edits to the page Carlos Gardel did not conform to Wikipedia's verifiability policy, and may have been removed. Wikipedia articles should refer only to facts and interpretations verified in reliable, reputable print or online sources or in other reliable media. Always provide a reliable source for quotations and for any material that is likely to be challenged, or it may be removed. Wikipedia also has a related policy against including original research in articles.

If you are stuck and looking for help, please see the guide for citing sources or come to The Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Again, welcome! - FlightTime (open channel) 03:22, 23 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

CS1 error on Capture of Saddam Hussein

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Capture of Saddam Hussein, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

A bare URL error. References show this error when one of the URL-containing parameters cannot be paired with an associated title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 00:55, 27 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Aggressive removal of unsourced material

Hey there—in general, it's not considered best to remove large segments of material that could be reliably sourced, like you did at First French Empire. The purpose of the tag is to allow people to find sources, they can't do that if the material has been removed. See WP:PRESERVE. Remsense ‥ 诉 01:44, 18 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I've done similarly at Dai Li. Please consider the importance and plausibility of the content you're removing, and try to cite it first if it's plausible, rather than just removing it. Thanks.Remsense ‥ 诉 01:50, 18 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:53, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]