Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2021–22 Scottish Amateur Cup

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Geschichte (talk) 09:39, 23 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

2021–22 Scottish Amateur Cup

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Deleted PROD. Amateur season competition which fails WP:FOOTY threshholds; fails WP:GNG due to scant media coverage. Author has now added many more results but only additional sources are self-published tweets from the (mostly very small-scale) clubs themselves. Crowsus (talk) 00:36, 16 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions. Crowsus (talk) 00:36, 16 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Scotland-related deletion discussions. Crowsus (talk) 00:36, 16 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 08:46, 16 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - no evidence of notability. Giant Snowman 18:05, 16 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete:Not a professional league. Fails NFOOTBALL. Lorenzo the great (talk) 07:26, 18 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
- Not wishing to be pedantic, but WP:NFOOTBALL makes no mention of leagues, this isn't a league anyway, and there has never been a requirement for a competition to be professional to have an article. If it was there would be no article on the FA Cup or even the UEFA Champions League, both of which have non-professional teams in.... -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 17:02, 18 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete does not have significant coverage. Peter303x (talk) 20:15, 21 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.