Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ankur Javeri

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete. czar ⨹ 20:06, 10 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Ankur Javeri

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I see no adequate evidence of notability here-- the references are not usable. DGG ( talk ) 19:08, 3 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - Clearly not notable. Harsh (talk) 19:47, 3 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Harsh (talk) 19:47, 3 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. Harsh (talk) 19:47, 3 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Comment -Subject doesn't meet the WP:BIO, WP:GNG or even WP:ANYBIO standard. But looking at their contribution in multiple notable films, to me it appears that WP:ENT crtieria #3 may be cited for their notability which states, "Has made unique, prolific or innovative contributions to a field of entertainment.". Anupmehra -Let's talk! 10:29, 4 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. Anupmehra -Let's talk! 10:30, 4 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete fails WP:42 and every other means of proving notability. Bearian (talk) 20:53, 4 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Delete I think he fails WP:ENT too. Dubbing roles weren't unique or innovative. Prolific might be hundreds of roles, not a dozen. He'd have to be mentioned somewhere other than in film credits. – Margin1522 (talk) 09:22, 6 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.