Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bayle Domon

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to List of Wheel of Time characters. Whether and what to merge, and who will be considered a "minor" character, is at editorial discretion as always. Seraphimblade ^{Talk to me} 06:36, 14 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Bayle Domon

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

None of the supporting characters in The Wheel of Time are notable or have reliable, substantial third party sources to support them. This is a followup to my AfD for Aviendha. All these articles are a better fit for Wikia, and in fact are already there. Exeva (talk) 02:03, 5 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I am also nominating the following related pages, per the reasons above. Exeva (talk) 02:13, 5 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fictional elements-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000^(talk) 04:30, 5 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Merge to List of Wheel of Time characters or Minor Wheel of Time characters, trimming and sourcing as appropriate. This really doesn't need to be at AfD, does it? Jclemens (talk) 04:35, 5 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Merge All to the appropriate lists per Jclemens. Pretty much all of these articles consist only of plot summary, and I'm not really finding anything that would indicate that any of these characters have the notability or sourcing required to have seperate articles. Rorshacma (talk) 06:16, 5 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:10, 6 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Merge all and permit articles to be re-split out pending proper sources. I don't typically like these big nominations with tons of articles, but I'm okay with this nomination because merges are relatively easy to revert. And overall, the lack of sourcing means that these articles don't WP:verify notability, which is a reason for deletion in many cases. Shooterwalker (talk) 23:00, 13 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.