Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Beda people

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was nomination withdrawn. (Non-admin closure). OccultZone (Talk • Contributions • Log) 13:22, 19 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Beda people

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

May not be notable as per Wikipedia guidelines. May also be mentioned in Jammu and Kashmir if necessary. Lakun.patra (talk) 09:26, 19 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Comment I had forgotten about this article, sorry. It is easily expanded and I am in the process of doing that now. - Sitush (talk) 10:41, 19 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Withdrawing Nomination Great Job @Sitush. Please improve the article as it seems you have some knowledge about this article.Lakun.patra (talk) 10:52, 19 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]
User:Lakun.patra why did you nominate this and what has changed in relation to the topic to affect notability of this topic? In ictu oculi (talk) 12:58, 19 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.