Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Caroleer Singers

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Redirect to Peter Pan Records. Don't see anything to merge, but pull sources from page history as you wish. czar ⨹ 19:23, 6 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Caroleer Singers

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This group does not seem to meet WP:NMUSIC or WP:GNG. Sources are links to online discography lists, but tells us nothing about the group other then they exist in some form. As there is no list of members it would suggest this is a transient music group hired/formed on the fly by the record label to cash in on the Christmas season. - McMatter ^(talk)/_(contrib) 14:11, 21 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. - McMatter ^(talk)/_(contrib) 14:12, 21 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. - McMatter ^(talk)/_(contrib) 14:13, 21 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. - McMatter ^(talk)/_(contrib) 14:13, 21 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. - McMatter ^(talk)/_(contrib) 14:14, 21 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, NorthAmerica¹⁰⁰⁰ 21:38, 28 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Biblioworm 02:19, 5 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Merge/Redirect to Peter Pan Records. The first source refers to "The Peter Pan Caroleers". Without identifiable members or independent recordings/activities and spanning 4 decades it doesn't appear to stand on its own. Vrac (talk) 03:02, 5 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, as per nomination, though I can see how they might just qualify for the redirect proposed above. Mark Marathon (talk) 08:48, 5 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Merge/Redirect - I agree that the article needs to redirect to Peter Pan Records. The subject may not be notable on its own merits, however it is a viable part of historic value to the record label.--Canyouhearmenow 13:32, 5 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.