Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cecilia Gessa

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. Randykitty (talk) 18:53, 29 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Cecilia Gessa

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Barely sourced BLP of a porn actress who is not demonstrated to fulfill WP:BIO, WP:ENT or WP:PORNBIO. Leefeni^{aures audiendi audiat} 16:59, 8 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 17:28, 8 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 17:29, 8 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Spain-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 17:29, 8 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sexuality and gender-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 17:30, 8 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been added to the WikiProject Pornography list of deletions.CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 17:34, 8 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - Find WP:GNG, Worked in considerable mainstream works in Spanish language.. [1][2].Guilherme Burn (talk) 18:04, 8 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Delete not enough sources to show notability.John Pack Lambert (talk) 01:27, 9 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Keep but fundamentally rewrite. The article is garbage in its current state, but the actress gets just enough mainstream press to pass WP:GNG/WP:BASIC, possibly even WP:ENT and WP:PORNBIO criterion 3.[3][4]. This former porn star has crossed over to a popular TV show. • Gene93k (talk) 17:25, 9 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, pet WP:TNT. Not an acceptable state for a BLP. It's unclear whether sufficient reliable sources exist for a biography. K.e.coffman (talk) 04:34, 11 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - meets of WP:GNG. The article needs to be expanded or/and translated from es.Wikipedia. Subtropical-man (talk / en-2) 17:06, 13 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 12:34, 15 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 13:08, 22 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - Article needs rewriting but the notability is certainly there, Meets ENT & GNG. –Davey2010^Talk 21:27, 27 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.