Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Farhat Bashir

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Restoring to userspace (User:Femonics/Farhat Bashir) per request. Please do not republish without addressing the sourcing issues as discussed. czar 07:10, 26 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Farhat Bashir

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Mentions of her only seem to be in passing and Seerab Technologies doesn't have an article so I can't see a valid WP:ATD. Despite the plethora of awards that she is supposed to have won, I can't see it being enough for WP:ANYBIO. The best sources I can find are what looks to be a social media profile page and a 3 sentence autobiography. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 16:25, 12 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 16:26, 12 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 16:26, 12 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Pakistan-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 16:26, 12 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Comment - please can an admin move the article back to main space? It was moved to draft without consensus by an involved editor (see my talk page for context). Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 17:12, 12 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Comment link to talk page discussion is here User_talk:Spiderone#Farhat_Bashir_article - I moved it to draft in good faith, as its inception was part of a WP:WikiProject Women in Red event, please also refer to article history for further context. Bashir meets GNG, in particular due to the P@SHA prizes and being a judge for the Hult Prize. Lajmmoore (talk) 18:45, 12 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Comment. I moved this back to article space per the above request. I have not formulated an opinion on whether it should stay an article, return to draft space, or be deleted altogether. —David Eppstein (talk) 19:02, 12 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Source assessment - this is my opinion on the current sources used, please let me know if you agree/disagree Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 06:48, 13 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

**Source assessment table:**
Source	Independent?	Reliable?	Significant coverage?	Count source toward GNG?
https://web.archive.org/web/20211012180646/https://www.seerab.com/about-us/	Her company's own website		Not mentioned	✘ No
https://web.archive.org/web/20211012181323/https://www.thedayspring.com.pk/seerab-maps-an-innovation-in-real-estate/			Mentioned once	✘ No
https://www.pasha.org.pk/psha-ict-awards-2018/	?	?	Not mentioned	✘ No
https://web.archive.org/web/20211012181929/http://www.hultprizeat.com/www.hultprizeat.com/cust			Probably the best source out of the ones cited but I'm still not seeing how being a judge on a student competition is enough to meet GNG	✘ No
https://web.archive.org/web/20211012182346/https://scientiamag.org/nasa-space-apps-challenge-pakistan-2019-a-success-story/			Mentioned once	✘ No
https://scientiamag.org/nasa-space-apps-challenge-pakistan-2019-a-success-story/			Mentioned once, seems to be same as above	✘ No
https://web.archive.org/web/20211012182507/https://www.womentech.net/en-gb/global-ambassadors/Pakistan/Farhat/Bashir	She is an ambassador for this organisation		3 sentences on her, nothing else	✘ No
https://www.apollo.io/companies/CXO-Pakistan/5e574e2a8868950001212563?chart=count	?	User generated	Not mentioned	✘ No
This table may not be a final or consensus view; it may summarize developing consensus, or reflect assessments of a single editor. Created using {{source assess table}}.

Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 06:48, 13 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - coverage is not significant. she may qualify with some more news per WP:TOOSOON. Peter303x (talk) 17:15, 14 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 23:55, 19 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Comment If consensus moves to deletion, I would like to request the article be moved back to user space. Lajmmoore (talk) 08:22, 20 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I would have no objections to that Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 18:28, 20 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Excellent source assement. I don't see anything else of worth on a before search. scope_creep^Talk 13:37, 20 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Nothing of significance here. Xxanthippe (talk) 01:57, 21 October 2021 (UTC).[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.