Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Inibsa (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was soft delete. WP:REFUND applies. If the previous AfD were more recent, I would have made a "keep" assumption, but standards from 2005 were different from today, especially around the notability of organizations. RL0919 (talk) 00:16, 8 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Inibsa

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The coverage (references, external links, etc.) does not seem sufficient to justify this article passing Wikipedia:General notability guideline and the more detailed Wikipedia:Notability (companies) requirement. The 2006 AfD was closed as keep because of WP:ITSNOTABLE assumption, with no reference cited. The article hasn't improved and I don't see much to add (WP:BEFORE yields little except one or two press releases, and mentions in passing). _{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 10:24, 19 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. CoolSkittle (talk) 11:06, 19 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Spain-related deletion discussions. CoolSkittle (talk) 11:06, 19 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Medicine-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 22:26, 19 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ifnord (talk) 07:23, 25 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Kpg jhp jm 07:08, 1 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.