Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kollision (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy delete per CSD G4. The criteria is substantially the same, which has been met, in my opinion. While there were changes, on the whole, the conditions have not changed since the first AfD, and as I'm the first person with access to the deleted version of the article to review the CSD, in my judgement it is appropriate to delete it under G4 rather than to let let the AfD run its course, especially as one of the participants in the AfD has suggested that. TonyBallioni (talk) 00:35, 24 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Kollision

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This page was put up for speedy delete, but as it was put up for speedy delete a few months ago, and removed by an admin on the grounds that the article was improved with new sources it was removed, I contested and removed the tag. Also, at the risk of a potential edit war with the speedy delete proposer, I am putting this up for AfD myself as this should be the process used. In addition, upon reviewing the page in question I can't quite tell if the notability is established or not, but I lean to no. I'm not well versed in Music topics so I am not the best to resolutely determine this. However, the notability is shakey and uncertain enough for me to feel an AfD is valid. This is also the second AfD for this page, the first of which can be found here: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kollision (1st nomination), which resulted in a delete vote in 2019. It was remade by the same person --Tautomers_{(T C)} 23:36, 23 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 23:43, 23 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Georgia (U.S. state)-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 23:43, 23 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete – as non-notable. Tautomers, why did you decline a G4 without having access to the deleted copy of the article? --Giraffer ^{(talk·contribs)} 00:16, 24 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Comment the core basis of my rationale is that the speedy delete proposal several months back was declined by an admin (see the articles edit history), and on a glance at the article and the sources, it did not seem obvious to me that a speedy deletion, nor a prod would have been valid. My appologies if I made a mistake in judgement, but it felt too hasty, and the subsequent reapplication of the speedy delete tag aggressive. --Tautomers_{(T C)} 00:25, 24 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.