Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Muhammad Iqbal bibliography

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Withdrawn by nom per all the speedy keeps. Facts, not fiction (talk) 19:07, 4 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Muhammad Iqbal bibliography

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Article already exists as a section on Muhammad Iqbal. This is redundant. Facts, not fiction (talk) 14:10, 4 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:31, 4 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Lists-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:32, 4 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bibliographies-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:32, 4 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Didn't you notice this is quite a bit bigger than that section? It's a WP:SPLIT from the main article. Unless you have something else, this is a WP:SPEEDYKEEP, 2e (clearly erroneous). postdlf (talk) 15:45, 4 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy keep I agree with User:Postdlf, the article is far more detailed than the section. --Vejvančický (talk | contribs) 16:13, 4 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy Keep per WP:PRESERVE as a reasonable WP:SPINOFF of the Muhammad Iqbal article. Afterward, perhaps the information can be merged into the main article. Northamerica1000^(talk) 17:59, 4 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy Keep Seems fairly standard to maintain a list of works by a notable writer and poet. --regentspark (comment) 18:24, 4 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.