Jump to content

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Naqshbandi Hussaini Golden Chain

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was merge to Sayyid Ghulam Hussain Shah Bukhari. MBisanz talk 22:02, 14 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Naqshbandi Hussaini Golden Chain (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Article created by a repeat sockpuppeteer. There have been no significant edits by anybody else, and no source material I'd trust (two links are to external pages created by the puppeteer). The article is totally tainted by association and lacks any virtue which overcomes that. Bazj (talk) 16:58, 12 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

  • Comment I am not seeing any reliable sources from my numerous newspaper sweeps, including Asia, India, Middle East. But there may be a problem with the name of the article. That is, the topic may be notable, but goes by a different name? This might be a subject which Wikipedia is not really good at covering.--Tomwsulcer (talk) 22:54, 12 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Islam-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:25, 13 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Lists of people-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:26, 13 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  • Merge Newspaper sources are not likely for a chain of succession going back to 11 AH = 632 CE. But this is apparently the succession of the leaders of the Naqshbandi, and should be merged in that article, where it is much needed . DGG ( talk ) 22:39, 20 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,  Sandstein  20:42, 21 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, NorthAmerica1000 21:58, 28 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Relisting comment: The discussion is leaning toward a merge, but two different merge targets have been presented. Relisting in hopes to obtain more input.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, NorthAmerica1000 23:18, 5 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.