Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/William Gunary

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect‎ to List of Essex County Cricket Club players. Arbitrarily0 ^(talk) 08:41, 24 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

William Gunary

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:GNG, WP:SPORTSCRIT #5.

Non-notable player; only played in one game and scored no points while doing so. No significant coverage in article, and none could be found. BilledMammal (talk) 08:18, 16 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople and Cricket. BilledMammal (talk) 08:18, 16 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Comment - "Scored no points" isn't a logical argument, but sure. That would be the equivalent of "scored no goals". I'd be surprised if we can't find anything - not the most common name out there. Bobo . 08:38, 16 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Despite earnest effort, I have perused Newspapers.com and NewspaperArchive, yet no trace of our forgotten Essex batsman emerged from their digital depths. A lamentable void, indeed! Jack4576 (talk) 08:41, 16 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Getting rid of county players is where we have arrived. There will always be something. Bobo . 08:46, 16 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: Alas, by the iron hand of 'SIGCOV', we consign this gallant cricketer to oblivion. Despite the duck, each wicket tells a tale, enriching our tapestry of knowledge. But, policy, unflinching, trims our canvas of obscurity, and in its zealous pruning, Wikipedia's mission, to capture all human understanding, is subtly, yet fundamentally, compromised. Jack4576 (talk) 08:39, 16 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If we were trying to capture "all human understanding", nothing would ever get deleted. But then I'm not a normal human... *good natured smile* Bobo . 08:48, 16 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

There is a decent merge target if it ever got that far, which for a county player would be sad. Bobo . 08:58, 16 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Indeed. Lamentable, unnecessary, wicked, and vile; such actions sell short the potential of our cherished project Jack4576 (talk) 10:13, 16 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not sure if you're being sarcastic, it's hard to tell... the "potential" of any project is for it to be philosophically "complete". The "aim"? As has been commented on many times, we speak as a community at cross-purposes depending on which direction we class as "complete", and have been doing so for a long time. Bobo . 10:24, 16 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I am sincere. I yearn for a project with better values than the lamentable incumbent guidelines; and I hope one day my fellow Wikipedians will one day join me too. Perhaps it will have to wait for the next generation. Jack4576 (talk) 11:10, 16 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Comment. Quite a few hits in The Recorder (Eastern Counties Times) (via BNA) if someone has time to investigate further... William Charles "Bill" Gunary was a farmer. He played club cricket for Dagenham and later Ilford, where he was captain from 1929–1932. All very local and routine though, so unlikely to be enough to warrant keeping an article about him. It should also be noted that he was a bowler, so the article's current focus on his batting is undue (a consequence of the dubious practice of synthesising articles from database entries and statistics). _wjemather^{please leave a message...} 09:55, 16 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Improving coverage as a bowler is not all that hard to fix... Bobo . 10:29, 16 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 11:47, 16 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The established consensus with articles such as this - established over a number of years - is to redirect to the obvious list if one exists - in this case List of Essex County Cricket Club players. There is clearly some contemporary media coverage of him and in cases like this it's entirely possible that other sources come to light that might make the article more viable as a standalone piece. In those terms, under WP:ATD - a *policy* not a guidelines - we should preserve the article history and attribution. A note can be added to his name to expand on what we have so far whilst we're at it, along the same lines as the other 3 notes that are already part of the list. Blue Square Thing (talk) 15:45, 16 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to List of Essex County Cricket Club players As of now, I'm not seeing enough, and those who are quite good at finding information haven't found much, for a GNG pass. However, there's the usual suitable redirect here per WP:ATD. Will reconsider if more is found though. Rugbyfan22 (talk) 19:17, 17 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.