Wikipedia:Files for deletion/2013 July 8

< July 7	July 9 >

July 8

File:BowserCastle-Start-MKDD.png

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by INeverCry (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 21:16, 16 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The file in question is a non-free screenshot of Mario Kart: Double Dash!! that is meant for use in the Lakitu article to illustrate the character. First, the character appears tiny in the image and is partially obscured (nearly invisible at thumbnail size), making it a very poor representation of the article's subject. Second, the actual depiction of the character is no different than the other, clearer, non-free promotional image that is used in the article already and is a more useful depiction. In short, it is a very poor non-free image for a purpose that has already been fulfilled. ThomasO1989 (talk) 00:13, 8 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Double Dash!!.png

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by INeverCry (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 21:16, 16 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The file is a non-free screenshot of Mario Kart: Double Dash!! which is meant "To demonstrate the elements of the game, including racing as a team." The screenshot itself is an extremely poor choice, as any of the "elements" the image was attempting to represent are concealed with a giant "START!" smacked in the middle of image. This non-free image is completely inappropriate for representing the article subject. --ThomasO1989 (talk) 00:27, 8 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Keep: I like it kept because it is used for the HUD article.
- Comment: I just replaced the image on HUD (video gaming) with a free image from SuperTuxKart according to WP:NFCC#1. RJaguar3 | u | t 15:34, 11 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Delete I guess there's no other choice. Just delete it. 22dragon22burn (talk) 15:41, 11 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Tony-blengino.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by INeverCry (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 21:16, 16 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Non-free image whose only use in on Matt Vasgersian. Fails WP:NFCC#1 in that Mr. Vasgersian is living and a free photo could presumably be taken of him. Additionally, the rationale is not specific to the use in Matt Vasgersian, with passages such as "The image is used for identification and clarification in the context of critical commentary of the work from which the screenshot is taken" which are inapplicable for the biography article in which it appears. RJaguar3 | u | t 02:39, 8 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

delete Without regard to the other problems listed, it's too small to actually allow identification of the bio subject. Mangoe (talk) 13:37, 10 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:CollingwoodDesign.png

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by INeverCry (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 21:16, 16 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Suprerceeded by vector, Was tagged for commons, but bot de-tagged. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 08:09, 8 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Hatcombine.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by INeverCry (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 21:16, 16 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Obseleted, This was tagged for Commons, but a bot de-tagged. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 08:43, 8 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Engineering stress strain.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by INeverCry (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 21:16, 16 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Obseleted, Was tagged for Commons, but bot de-tagged. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 09:14, 8 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Boston Marathon 2010 in Wellesley.JPG

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by INeverCry (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT ⚡ 21:16, 16 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Noncommercial: flickr.com Edgars2007 ^{(talk/contribs)} 10:00, 8 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Tree of life.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by INeverCry (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT ⚡ 21:16, 16 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Obseleted by vector, Sfan00 IMG (talk) 10:04, 8 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Macule.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted as F8 by Legoktm (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:03, 24 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Obseleted by Vector, Was tagged for Commons, but bot de-tagged. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 10:10, 8 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Move to commons the SVG version is unlabelled, while this one is labelled -- 76.65.128.222 (talk) 06:33, 9 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Basilarmembrane2.JPG

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by INeverCry (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 21:16, 16 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Obseleted by vector, Was tagged for Commons, but bot de-tagged. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 10:26, 8 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Long Beach08.gif

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted as F8 by Legoktm (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT ⚡ 23:02, 24 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Obseleted, by vector, was tagged for Commons, but bot de-tagged. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 10:31, 8 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Move to commons this is a cleaner and simpler representation than the one on Commons, so if editors want to use a simpler version, this should be available. -- 76.65.128.222 (talk) 06:32, 9 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Brands Hatch 'Indy' layout.png

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted as F8 by Legoktm (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT ⚡ 23:02, 24 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Obselted by vector, Was tagged for Commons, but de-tagged by bot Sfan00 IMG (talk) 10:32, 8 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Keep the SVG is clearly not the same circuit. Circuits can be reconfigured, and we can't just use any old picture just because one for the circuit exists, it does not mean it's the same configuration as raced. -- 76.65.128.222 (talk) 06:27, 9 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Mode.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by INeverCry (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT ⚡ 21:16, 16 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Obselted by vector, Sfan00 IMG (talk) 11:10, 8 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Verybroadclimatemap.png

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by INeverCry (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 21:16, 16 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Obesleted, Was tagged for Commons, but bot de-tagged Sfan00 IMG (talk) 12:38, 8 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:AsianaAirlinesFlight214.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted as F7 by Future Perfect at Sunrise (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 12:08, 10 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Replaceable non-free image; the underlying copyrighted maps data can be replaced and is only incidental to the understanding gained from this image. (ESkog)^(Talk) 17:02, 8 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I am unsure if the flightaware data can be incorporated into a free, self-rendered map/CGI, or a free map/CGI that has the same perception/view of the bay which I believe is critical to the image. It is a Google Earth layer created by FlightAware. Feedthepope (talk) 17:20, 8 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This is a good image, but the left side bar heavily detracts from the quality of the image. If there's a way to improve the image while keeping the same source, that would be useful. As for the deletion candidate, was the original poster able to get permission to use it? The Legacy (talk) 17:40, 8 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This is a very important image. It can, and should, be re-drawn effectively. The same image could be re-rendered as SVG using green for land and blue for water, effectively tracing this image and preserving the glide slope information plus the geometry of the image, neither of which is copyrighted. The problem in this case is the copyright on the ground cover imagery. -- ke4roh (talk) 17:49, 8 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

FlightAware data is public that could be found from multiple sources; Basically just altitude/lat-long coordinates they or someone on the pilot forum pprune.org formatted into a Google Earth layer. As for Google Earth itself, Google claims - "No explicit permission is required for your project." (I'd like to use your maps on my website or in my application. What do I need to know?) Feedthepope (talk) 18:25, 8 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Why to replace it? It provides crucial information sourced from non-copyrighted data. Cwobeel (talk) 18:47, 8 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

You've explained why it should be replaced, we are able to recreate the image therefore there is absolutely no justification under our NFCC policy to use an image which is not available under free licence. And Google Earth content is not available under a free licence. Nil Einne (talk) 18:58, 9 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:RINO Logo.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by INeverCry (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 21:16, 16 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Described incorrectly as a "Party logo", this tweak of the US Republican Party's logo appears novel and may be original art for a blog article. If that is the case, this is not reasonable fair use.

Uploader added this image to the article Republican In Name Only, but AFAIK it is entirely decorative, and not illustrative of symbols in use by any notable political movement. (Unlike the No RINOs button design used in the same article.) / edg ☺ ☭ 18:39, 8 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

delete It's not a logo of an organization; it's a parody image owned by its creator. There's no RINO organization for this to be the logo of. It seems to have extremely limited circulation and isn't discussed, so I don't see using it (and therefore keeping it). Mangoe (talk) 13:35, 10 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Oswald and alleged double.jpeg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by INeverCry (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 21:16, 16 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Alleged to be public domain, but does not identify creator or source. Image evidently created to push a particular POV so it is likely unusable in most relevant articles. Gamaliel (talk) 19:54, 8 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.