Wikipedia:Files for discussion/2018 November 18

< November 17	November 19 >

November 18

File:Molecularium1.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 07:06, 26 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Old file, but text only says "Image appears on http://www.nanotoon.com but is no copyright is specified. Used here for educational purposes only for the Molecularium page.". I think this should change to a non-free image Ronhjones ^(Talk) 01:49, 25 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 10:10, 2 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 09:59, 10 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 09:38, 18 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Bogus license reason. I have very little idea about what I'm even looking at. It would be impossible (for me; anyone else is free to try their luck) to write a rationale so keeping it as non-free is worthless. – Finnusertop (talk ⋅ contribs) 23:08, 18 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Ruth Brown Snyder mugshot.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: relisted on 2018 November 26. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 07:22, 26 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

File:Ruth Brown Snyder mugshot.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Ralph Lauren clothing

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 07:22, 26 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Non-free images used in the Art Deco article. Together, the images fail WP:NFCC#3a as we do not need two examples of Ralph Lauren clothing. The images also fail WP:NFCC#1 as the article contains free images of art deco inspired clothing. It fails WP:NFCC#8 as there isn't significant sourced commentay about these images or the clothing depicted. Whpq (talk) 15:33, 10 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Firstly, there is no free images of art deco inspired clothing in modern fashion these two are examples of art deco clothes in today's fashion industry. secondly, we do need two examples of Ralph Lauren clothing because one is art deco tailoring and one an art deco patterned outfit. There is a difference. Bi-on-ic (talk) 15:45, 10 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Delete both images, as they are not needed in the Art Deco article, and per Whpq, the images fail WP:NFCC#1 and WP:NFCC#8. Coldcreation (talk) 16:16, 10 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 09:38, 18 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Tailoring or patterned outfits are not discussed in the article so there is no way these could meet WP:NFCC#8. – Finnusertop (talk ⋅ contribs) 22:31, 18 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:XTC Go 2.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: relisted on 2018 November 26. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 07:23, 26 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

File:XTC Go 2.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Pink Floyd - all members.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: relisted on 2018 November 26. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 07:24, 26 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

File:Pink Floyd - all members.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Siouxsie and the Banshees voices.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: relisted on 2018 November 26. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 07:27, 26 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

File:Siouxsie and the Banshees voices.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Samit Hota Official.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 07:06, 26 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Out of scope personal image Magog the Ogre (t • c) 19:29, 18 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete out of scope - uploader is using the wiki as a social platform. Cabayi (talk) 19:59, 18 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as out of scope. I also nominated the same image on Commons for deletion for the same reason. — JJMC89 (T·C) 20:04, 18 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - per nom. - FlightTime (open channel) 20:08, 18 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Yes you can delete Samit Hota Official.jpg ~SamiHotaIn

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Sedition, 1986.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 07:06, 26 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Per Talk:Sedition (UK band)#Untitled, the file's uploader is also the photo's subject, so he's unlikely to also be the photographer and copyright holder. Would need more info if otherwise. czar 22:31, 18 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.