Wikipedia:Files for discussion/2024 November 7

November 7

File:Attachment-Identity-Morality triad.jpg

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more files. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the file's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 14:54, 14 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File has been on WP for a decade and never been used. There are no references or precedents cited, suggesting WP:OR. Some of the concepts here seem related to Myers–Briggs Type Indicator and similar personality quizzes, but others appear to be completely made up ("ego crimes"). I confess, the whole thing looks like nonsense to me. Matt Deres (talk) 03:36, 7 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the file's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:KES footer logo.png

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more files. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the file's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 14:54, 14 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

There is no evidence on the file description page that this version of the coat of arms is actually freely licensed. — Ирука¹³ 05:19, 7 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the file's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Portugalia logo.svg

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more files. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the file's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 03:53, 15 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Former logo which does not significantly enhance the article, so fails WP:NFCC#8. Also fails WP:NFCC#1 as it is replaceable with a free, current logo File:Portugalia Airlines New Logo.svg. Also has a non-free rationale for Qualiflyer article, but would not be a valid free use there either, as it's not the logo of that company/reqrds program. Joseph2302 (talk) 16:20, 7 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the file's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Qualiflyercard.png

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more files. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the file's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 03:53, 15 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Image of this bank card does not significantly enhance the article, as the card is the same as the company logo with a couple of additional logos. Also fails WP:NFCC#3- minimal number of non-free items- as File:Qualiflyer2.png suffices as the only non-free image on that article. Joseph2302 (talk) 16:23, 7 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the file's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Ring Lady.JPG

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more files. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the file's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 03:53, 15 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The image is not in the public domain because it was taken after 1976. The publication date is also questionable. — Ирука¹³ 18:52, 7 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the file's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Yarmouth Castle fire.JPG

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more files. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the file's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Not a freely licensed file. No prejudice to restoration if someone can create a valid fair use claim for the file. -Fastily 23:07, 15 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Since neither the date of publication, nor its location, nor the author of the photo are known, it is not possible to determine the licensing status of the image. — Ирука¹³ 19:05, 7 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Location: 120 miles east of Miami and 60 miles northwest of Nassau on 13 November 1965. Author indeed unknown (a passenger on Bahama Star). I think that this is probably cropped from the photo distributed by Associated Press on the following day; it looks a little different, but note that that image is a b&w version of the "blue separation print" for colour reproduction. This one is definitely the same image. It most probably appeared in the American papers on 14-15 Nov.

But would this not qualify for non-free use on enWP? - Davidships (talk) 02:31, 9 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the file's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.