Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files/2010 October 28

< October 27	October 29 >

October 28

File:Anujcar.jpg

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:07, 11 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Anujcar.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

File:Anuj sharma poster 3.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs)

File:Anuj khwaab poster 2.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs)

File:Anuj khwaab poster.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs)

File:Anuj pink.JPG (delete | talk | history | logs)

File:ANNU.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs)

File:Anuj1111111111111111111211111.JPG (delete | talk | history | logs)

A mix of "self" made "posters" and other items. All are claimed as "self" but I am not sure - on the other hand the collages and "posters" may well have been created by the upoader, but the underlying images may not have been. Many were taken form nagmanoj2's photostream at Flickr. (example anuj's KHWAAB poster 7 upped at Flckr March 8, 2010 - all rights reserved, File:Anuj sharma poster 3.jpg upped here March 9, 2010 as {{PD-self}}) Most are unused, some have no source or author information. One also contains a drawing. Other images have been deleted for various reason and in 2008 the user was warned about uploading images "without sources and/or copyright information." Soundvisions1 (talk) 00:25, 28 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per above.--ARTEST4ECHO ^{(talk|contribs)} 20:31, 2 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:ANZACAT.jpg

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:07, 11 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:ANZACAT.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

Unused, low rez, image marked as "Title logo". Soundvisions1 (talk) 00:46, 28 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Artofdying21.png

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:07, 11 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Artofdying21.png (delete | talk | history | logs).

File:AOD logo name.jpeg (delete | talk | history | logs)

Unused images. A promo shot and a logo. Based on the users other uploads these are most likely not really {{PD-self}} as they claim. Soundvisions1 (talk) 00:50, 28 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Slaven Musa.JPG

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:07, 11 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Slaven Musa.JPG (delete | talk | history | logs).

Image is likely a copyvio, there is no evidence to support the uploaders claim to own the copyright. The uploader has claimed copyright of a diverse number of lo-res images, all are likely copyvios most likely taken from an unknown website. E. Fokker (talk) 01:05, 28 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Vlado Zadro.jpg

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:07, 11 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Vlado Zadro.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

Image is likely a copyvio, there is no evidence to support the uploaders claim to own the copyright. The uploader has claimed copyright of a diverse number of lo-res images, all are likely copyvios most likely taken from an unknown website. E. Fokker (talk) 01:06, 28 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Mate Dragičević.JPG

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:07, 11 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Mate Dragičević.JPG (delete | talk | history | logs).

Image is likely a copyvio, there is no evidence to support the uploaders claim to own the copyright. The uploader has claimed copyright of a diverse number of lo-res images, all are likely copyvios most likely taken from an unknown website. E. Fokker (talk) 01:07, 28 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Vernes Selimović.JPG

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:07, 11 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Vernes Selimović.JPG (delete | talk | history | logs).

Image is likely a copyvio, there is no evidence to support the uploaders claim to own the copyright. The uploader has claimed copyright of a diverse number of lo-res images, all are likely copyvios most likely taken from an unknown website. E. Fokker (talk) 01:07, 28 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Jimmy bulus (2).jpg

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:07, 11 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Jimmy bulus (2).jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

Image is likely a copyvio, there is no evidence to support the uploaders claim to own the copyright. The uploader has claimed copyright of a diverse number of lo-res images, all are likely copyvios most likely taken from an unknown website. E. Fokker (talk) 01:08, 28 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Idrissa laouali.jpg

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:07, 11 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Idrissa laouali.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

Image is likely a copyvio, there is no evidence to support the uploaders claim to own the copyright. The uploader has claimed copyright of a diverse number of lo-res images, all are likely copyvios most likely taken from an unknown website. E. Fokker (talk) 01:09, 28 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Alassane.jpg

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:07, 11 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Alassane.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

Image is likely a copyvio, there is no evidence to support the uploaders claim to own the copyright. The uploader has claimed copyright of a diverse number of lo-res images, all are likely copyvios most likely taken from an unknown website. E. Fokker (talk) 01:09, 28 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Lassina karim konate.jpg

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:07, 11 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Lassina karim konate.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

Image is likely a copyvio, there is no evidence to support the uploaders claim to own the copyright. The uploader has claimed copyright of a diverse number of lo-res images, all are likely copyvios most likely taken from an unknown website. E. Fokker (talk) 01:10, 28 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Issoufou alhassane.jpg

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:07, 11 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Issoufou alhassane.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

Image is likely a copyvio, there is no evidence to support the uploaders claim to own the copyright. The uploader has claimed copyright of a diverse number of lo-res images, all are likely copyvios most likely taken from an unknown website. E. Fokker (talk) 01:10, 28 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Kamilou.jpg

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:07, 11 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Kamilou.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

Image is likely a copyvio, there is no evidence to support the uploaders claim to own the copyright. The uploader has claimed copyright of a diverse number of lo-res images, all are likely copyvios most likely taken from an unknown website. E. Fokker (talk) 01:11, 28 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Dela sacko.jpg

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:07, 11 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Dela sacko.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

Image is likely a copyvio, there is no evidence to support the uploaders claim to own the copyright. The uploader has claimed copyright of a diverse number of lo-res images, all are likely copyvios most likely taken from an unknown website. E. Fokker (talk) 01:12, 28 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Koffi dan kowa - 18.jpg

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:07, 11 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Koffi dan kowa - 18.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

Image is likely a copyvio, there is no evidence to support the uploaders claim to own the copyright. The uploader has claimed copyright of a diverse number of lo-res images, all are likely copyvios most likely taken from an unknown website. E. Fokker (talk) 01:12, 28 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Chikhoto.jpg

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:07, 11 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Chikhoto.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

Image is likely a copyvio, there is no evidence to support the uploaders claim to own the copyright. The uploader has claimed copyright of a diverse number of lo-res images, all are likely copyvios most likely taken from an unknown website. E. Fokker (talk) 01:13, 28 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Kader.jpg

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:07, 11 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Kader.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

Image is likely a copyvio, there is no evidence to support the uploaders claim to own the copyright. The uploader has claimed copyright of a diverse number of lo-res images, all are likely copyvios most likely taken from an unknown website. E. Fokker (talk) 01:14, 28 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Shamweel.jpg

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:07, 11 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Shamweel.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

Image is likely a copyvio, there is no evidence to support the uploaders claim to own the copyright. The uploader has claimed copyright of a diverse number of lo-res images, all are likely copyvios most likely taken from an unknown website. E. Fokker (talk) 01:15, 28 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:M. aničić.jpg

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:07, 11 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:M. aničić.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

Image is likely a copyvio, there is no evidence to support the uploaders claim to own the copyright. The uploader has claimed copyright of a diverse number of lo-res images, all are likely copyvios most likely taken from an unknown website. E. Fokker (talk) 01:15, 28 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Melher.jpg

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:07, 11 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Melher.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

Image is likely a copyvio, there is no evidence to support the uploaders claim to own the copyright. The uploader has claimed copyright of a diverse number of lo-res images, all are likely copyvios most likely taken from an unknown website. E. Fokker (talk) 01:16, 28 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Džidić.jpg

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:07, 11 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Džidić.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

Image is likely a copyvio, there is no evidence to support the uploaders claim to own the copyright. The uploader has claimed copyright of a diverse number of lo-res images, all are likely copyvios most likely taken from an unknown website. E. Fokker (talk) 01:17, 28 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Salcinovic.jpg

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:07, 11 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Salcinovic.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

Image is likely a copyvio, there is no evidence to support the uploaders claim to own the copyright. The uploader has claimed copyright of a diverse number of lo-res images, all are likely copyvios most likely taken from an unknown website. E. Fokker (talk) 01:17, 28 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Vjeran simunić.jpg

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:07, 11 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Vjeran simunić.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

Image is likely a copyvio, there is no evidence to support the uploaders claim to own the copyright. The uploader has claimed copyright of a diverse number of lo-res images, all are likely copyvios most likely taken from an unknown website. E. Fokker (talk) 01:18, 28 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Rabo saminou.jpg

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:07, 11 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Rabo saminou.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

Image is likely a copyvio, there is no evidence to support the uploaders claim to own the copyright. The uploader has claimed copyright of a diverse number of lo-res images, all are likely copyvios most likely taken from an unknown website. E. Fokker (talk) 01:19, 28 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Werleman.jpg

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:07, 11 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Werleman.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

Image is likely a copyvio, there is no evidence to support the uploaders claim to own the copyright. The uploader has claimed copyright of a diverse number of lo-res images, all are likely copyvios most likely taken from an unknown website. E. Fokker (talk) 01:20, 28 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Barthelemy.jpg

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:07, 11 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Barthelemy.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

Image is likely a copyvio, there is no evidence to support the uploaders claim to own the copyright. The uploader has claimed copyright of a diverse number of lo-res images, all are likely copyvios most likely taken from an unknown website. E. Fokker (talk) 01:21, 28 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Djikoloum.jpg

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:07, 11 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Djikoloum.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

Image is likely a copyvio, there is no evidence to support the uploaders claim to own the copyright. The uploader has claimed copyright of a diverse number of lo-res images, all are likely copyvios most likely taken from an unknown website. E. Fokker (talk) 01:21, 28 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Jaani Dushman 2.jpg

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Magog the Ogre (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 10:37, 4 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Jaani Dushman 2.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

An official film poster tagged with free licenses. Not likely that the uploader is the copyright holder or an authorised representative thereof. Nyttend (talk) 03:05, 28 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Cheez-It-Box-Small.jpg

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: keep. File licensed under fair use, ineligible for deletion in this venue. files for deletion is that way. — ξ ^xplicit 06:29, 11 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Cheez-It-Box-Small.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

emerson7 05:59, 28 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

i'm not sure why this is here. it's a picture that i took myself, and follows the guidelines for product images. the file replaced one uploaded by emerson7, so it might have been put up for deletion because of that.

Evan-Amos
Note: This image is currently tagged as non-free. If there is a dispute with the rationale, please tag the image with {{dfu}} or list it at WP:Non-free content review. Otherwise, unless there is another reason for listing here, the listing will be closed by an administrator and the image kept. AnomieBOT ⚡ 00:40, 31 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Comment: The image actually was tagged with {{dfu}} on October 28 (See this) and it was than tagged as unused by a bot (see this) and than removed by the same bot later the same day and *then* the rest of the tags were removed October 31. (see this dif). I actually would concur with the {{dfu}} tag so I am not sure why the bot removed it causing another bot to post here saying to tag it as dfu. Soundvisions1 (talk) 02:00, 11 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Emperor of Exmoor.jpg

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Kept - This is not a "possibly unfree image" but an unfree image for sure. Please take it to Images for Deletion if one wants to delete this image.

File:Emperor of Exmoor.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

Invalid licence: article is not about the Daily Mail or photographer JohnBlackburne^words_deeds 10:13, 28 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Understanding from "article or issue in question" - "issue" only means copy of publication, not subject of photo. However, from directly from WP:Non-free_content, these terms all seem satisfied:

1. No free equivalent. -

2. Respect for commercial opportunities. - Use on Wikipedia does not reduce paid opportunities - image has been licensed for use on many newspapers.

3a. Minimal usage. -

, only one is used.

3b. Minimal extent of use. -

- low resolution (257x210) is used. Even lower resolution can be used if this is preferred.

4. Previous publication. -

5. Content - meets WP standards, is encyclopedic, as it shows this particular deer, the Emperor of Exmoor.

6. Media-specific policy - Free is preferred, non-free is not preferred but may be allowed in some circumstances. Help is requested understanding the valid circumstances.

7. One article minimum.

8. Contextual significance.

Image shows subject of article in its environment, large rack of antlers, beard etc.

9. Restrictions on location.

- only used in article space, no galleries.

10. Image description page.

10a. Identification of source

10b. Copyright tags - ? - this tag may be the incorrect one. Please help select the correct tag, if it is incorrect. Specifically, would either {{Template:Non-free fair use in}} or {{Template:Non-free historic image}} apply?

10c. Name of article is listed.

Emperor of Exmoor.

--Lexein (talk) 02:47, 29 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Used in an article about the subject of the image, has a FUR, animal is dead, so no free equivalent can be reasonably obtained.

Copyright tag might be better as {{non-free fair use in}}.
Circumstances for using this image under fair use are in these sorts of cases: when the subject of the image is deceased, so one cannot take a photo of it, and put it into the article. Since there is no existing image in, or free equivalent available for, the article, it should be fine. /ƒETCH COMMS / 03:00, 29 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Actually there seems a fair bit of doubt whether the animal is dead - see Talk:Emperor of Exmoor. In which case the image is not irreplaceable and a free copy could be obtained. Le Deluge (talk) 08:08, 29 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Kia.Abdullah.jpg

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:07, 11 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Kia.Abdullah.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

Same image as in Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files/2009 July 6#File:Kia Abdullah.jpg, so I guess the delete decision there also applies to this copy. Lupo 13:34, 28 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Question: Is the Wikimedia Commons version that is now showing through the same as the ones that were deleted here? If it is someone should wander over there and tag it citing the deletion discussions here. Soundvisions1 (talk) 02:05, 11 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Peter Schlicht.jpg

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:07, 11 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Peter Schlicht.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

Orphaned image that appears to be a studio photo, meaning uploader is not copyright holder. --ARTEST4ECHO ^{(talk|contribs)} 14:31, 28 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Robert william witt.jpg

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:07, 11 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Robert william witt.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

First, no source or author supplied. Second publicity photos are usually owned by the company promoting this person, which is probably not the uploader.--ARTEST4ECHO ^{(talk|contribs)} 14:37, 28 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Know your Democracy x Place!.png

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:07, 11 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Know your Democracy x Place!.png (delete | talk | history | logs).

File:Know your Place.png (delete | talk | history | logs).

One image is signed by it's creator "Debbie Morris" who is not the uploader. I will accept that these may be {{PD-text}}, however both images are Orphaned. Therfore, even if they are I see no reason to keep them. --ARTEST4ECHO ^{(talk|contribs)} 16:01, 28 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Paper Doll album.jpg

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Scott MacDonald (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 00:40, 31 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Paper Doll album.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

File:Perfect Time For A Breakdown.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

Alumb covers are usully non-free images owned by record compay, not {{pd-self}}. --ARTEST4ECHO ^{(talk|contribs)} 17:07, 28 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Ajax1.jpg

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:07, 11 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Ajax1.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

Has a copyright claim. see "copyright Gary Ashanollah 2010" --ARTEST4ECHO ^{(talk|contribs)} 17:15, 28 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:CMB AIRPORT.jpg

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 08:09, 11 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:CMB AIRPORT.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

no evidence at [1] that the image has been released into the public domain or is the work of the uploader MilborneOne (talk) 17:21, 28 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Aspiraf620-3.jpg

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:07, 11 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Aspiraf620-3.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

No source is given, but this appears to be a photo that the car company itself would create to adverizing purpose. Note the white floor with sky backgroud. Fair-use is probbly out since it fails "No free equivalent" as someone outther has taken a free equivalent photo of this car. --ARTEST4ECHO ^{(talk|contribs)} 17:56, 28 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Bahia Incident.JPG

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: delete - sorry. Without further information compelling its non-copyright status (e.g., who was the author? Might it have been published beforehand?) or whether it comes with a copyright notice in the encyclopedia, we are forced to assume it is not public domain. Uploader has not provided information in two weeks since notification of deletion. Magog the Ogre (talk) 00:06, 14 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Bahia Incident.JPG (delete | talk | history | logs).

This image is sources from The Oxford History of the American People, published 1965, meaning this is not a {{pd-self}} and copyrighted. However, it is very possible, that this image is still Public Domain. If the image itself is PD independent of the book, such as if it was drawn by someone else before the book was printed. However, no information as to whom this author would be, if he exists.--ARTEST4ECHO ^{(talk|contribs)} 18:14, 28 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Surely this is in the public domain after 146 years? It could use a crop, though. — ξ ^xplicit 06:29, 11 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Bfslogo.gif

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Withdrawn Changed to fair use by uploader.--ARTEST4ECHO ^{(talk|contribs)} 18:34, 2 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Bfslogo.gif (delete | talk | history | logs).

Logo for Big Fat Simulations, (not {{pd-self}}). May need to be make into {{non-free logo}} since image probably doesn’t qualify for {{pd-textlogo}} since image contains more then "simple geometric shapes". --ARTEST4ECHO ^{(talk|contribs)} 18:25, 28 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:30th Anniversary Edition.jpg

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section. Then remove the edit button.

The result of the discussion was: Withdrawn. Changed to {{PD-textlogo}}--ARTEST4ECHO ^{(talk|contribs)} 18:37, 2 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:30th Anniversary Edition.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

derivative work of 30th Anniversary Edition Subaru Legacy wagon. Taking a photo of a copyrighted item doesn’t create a new copyright or release original copyright. Could be changed to fair use. --ARTEST4ECHO ^{(talk|contribs)} 18:55, 28 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Cbpgecjlogo.JPG

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: keep, file licensed under fair use. — ξ ^xplicit 06:29, 11 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Cbpgecjlogo.JPG (delete | talk | history | logs).

Is not {{pd-self}} since it's a logo. Should probably be {{nonfree logo}}. --ARTEST4ECHO ^{(talk|contribs)} 19:56, 28 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I have changed this to {{nonfree logo}}.--ARTEST4ECHO ^{(talk|contribs)} 20:04, 2 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This image is currently tagged as non-free. If there is a dispute with the rationale, please tag the image with {{dfu}} or list it at WP:Non-free content review. Otherwise, unless there is another reason for listing here, the listing will be closed by an administrator and the image kept. AnomieBOT ⚡ 10:37, 4 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:McMichael.Canadian.Art.Collection.jpg

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:07, 11 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:McMichael.Canadian.Art.Collection.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

Book cover. --ARTEST4ECHO ^{(talk|contribs)} 20:10, 28 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Maharani Bhavashankari.jpg

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:07, 11 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Maharani Bhavashankari.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

Highly doubtful that uploader owns the copyright since this is obviously a painting of some kind. Is unused so can't be fair use. My still be PD but no information is given regarding who the painter is. --ARTEST4ECHO ^{(talk|contribs)} 20:21, 28 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Loose Tubes.jpg

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Withdrawn Changed to fair use by uploader. --ARTEST4ECHO ^{(talk|contribs)} 21:19, 28 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Loose Tubes.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

I question the idea that user:Nostalgic34 took this photo in 1985 himself. More then likely this is a promotional photo whose copyright is owned by the band or some company they work for. Should probably be {{Non-free promotional}}. --ARTEST4ECHO ^{(talk|contribs)} 20:37, 28 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Uploads by User:Griffiths911

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: keep File:Bristol Group.JPG and File:Cardiff21982.JPG, delete the rest. — ξ ^xplicit 06:29, 11 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The following images are incorporates:

Most of the uploader's files have been deleted as copyvios; this casts a suspicion on these images and they should be deleted absent robust proof of ownership. Stifle (talk) 08:20, 4 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Please see here These 2 were definitely taken by Ken (File:Bristol Group.JPG + File:Cardiff21982.JPG), the rest are not free and I'm not sure about the File:Captain MGT Harris.JPG one. Ryan4314 (talk) 20:31, 4 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted from here to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks--ARTEST4ECHO ^{(talk|contribs)} 21:08, 28 October 2010 (UTC) [reply]

Keep only File:Bristol Group.JPG & File:Cardiff21982.JPG: Delete rest.--ARTEST4ECHO ^{(talk|contribs)} 17:10, 27 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
I concur. Ryan4314 (talk) 22:46, 28 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Files uploaded by User:Market Development

File:Pic-kimani.jpg

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:07, 11 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Pic-kimani.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

Zero proof of ownership of files and variety of cameras and locations of this user's uploaded media suggests that these are unfree (see also on commons) SFB 21:59, 28 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Other possibly unfree files by user [2],[3],[4],[5],[6],[7],[8],[9],[10], all used on Bellin Run.

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.