User:Nicodene: difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Content deleted Content added
Tag: 2017 source edit |
No edit summary Tag: 2017 source edit |
||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{Babel|en-4|fr-3| |
{{Babel|en-4|fr-3|ka-3|la-3|ca-2|it-2|pt-2|es-2|uk-2|footer=Read level 2 as “able to read with ease but unable to speak properly”.}} |
||
I mainly deal with entries in Romance languages and (when relevant) Latin. |
I mainly deal with entries in Romance languages and (when relevant) Latin. |
||
Revision as of 21:32, 28 September 2024
Wiktionary:Babel | ||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||||||||
Read level 2 as “able to read with ease but unable to speak properly”. |
I mainly deal with entries in Romance languages and (when relevant) Latin.
Agenda
Recategorize all 1099 Catalan words that are claimed to be ‘inherited from Old Occitan’ as either inherited from Old Catalan/Latin or borrowed from Old Occitan.✓Remove hundreds of fake Mozarabic words added by Romandalusí, often through thirty or so different IP's.✓- Sort through categories for Romance words claimed to be ‘inherited from Latin’ and remove the ones that clearly weren't.
Catalan✓ 15/08/23Franco-Provençal✓ 08/06/24- French:
- Italian:
- Neapolitan (largely complete)
- Occitan:
- Portuguese:
- Romanian
Spanish✓ 03/09/22
- Move all 'Reconstructed Latin terms' which are in fact attested (in the appropriate time period) to the mainspace, with citations.
- Recategorize all ‘Terms inherited from Medieval Latin’ as one of the following: (largely complete)
- Inherited from Early Medieval Latin (attested up to ca. 10th c. AD)
- Borrowed from (later) Medieval Latin (attested 11th c. and later)
- Inherited from a reconstructed ‘Vulgar Latin’ term (unattested anywhere prior to 11th c.)
- Neapolitan clean-up:
Fix/check metaphonic plurals✓- Fix IPA transcriptions (largely complete)
Relemmatize verbs to ⟨-re⟩ spellings✓
- Franco-Provençal overhaul:
Move all lemmas to ORB spellings✓Add Swadesh list words✓- Add pronouns (largely complete)
- Fix the verb conjugations
- Add references to AIS/ALF/FEW wherever applicable
- Add altforms per DFP/LTA/FEW
Miscellanea
- Mozarabic kharjas
- Italian terms inherited from Latin
- French terms inherited from Latin
- Survivals of the Latin nominative in Romance
- Latin terms with variable monophthongization
- Italian terms with voicing of Latin /-p t k-/
- Catalan masculine forms with -o
- Georgian terms with /f/
Pet peeves
- If a language has phonemic stress, its presence or absence should be indicated in monosyllabic words, not omitted for the sake of typographical convenience. Consider the minimal pair Anne :: an, that is /ˈæn/ :: /æn/. Representing both as /æn/ would fail to account for the differences in surface realization.[1]
- There is no such thing as contrastive syllable division or contrastive secondary stress in any of the languages with which I am familiar.[2] Any claimed example falls apart once one accounts for morphology.
- Night-rate :: nitrate = ⫽ˈnaɪt+ˈɹeɪt⫽ :: ⫽ˈnaɪtɹeɪt⫽[3] = [ˈnaɪt.ˌɹeɪt] :: [ˈnaɪ.ʧɹeɪt]
- Reagan :: raygun = ⫽ˈɹeɪɡən⫽ :: ⫽ˈɹeɪ+ˈɡʌn⫽ = [ˈɹeɪ.ɡən] :: [ˈɹeɪ.ˌɡʌn]
- Statements along the lines of “X was predominantly an oral language until modern times” are meaningless. Literally every living language was, and many still are.