Always analyse first and do not rush to any conclusions , feedback are important but are not priority guide line. Mostly depends on situations to adapt in different circumstances

When navigating conflicting feedback on game innovation, I prioritize aligning with the core vision and target audience preferences. First, I analyze each piece of feedback to identify patterns and separate subjective opinions from objective insights. Then, I consider the project goals, gameplay experience, and market trends to evaluate which ideas add real value. I also consult my team to leverage their expertise and perspectives. By balancing user-centric insights with the game's unique vision, I can make informed decisions that strengthen both innovation and appeal.

Necesitas filtrar el ámbito. No es lo mismo desarrollar para un móvil, para PC o para consola. Al igual que no es lo mismo un indie que un triple A. O incluso ver si es un juego VR, AR.... Una vez tienes la categoría exacta, esas contradicciones habrán desaparecido prácticamente todas

I would take a step back and look at what your ultimate goal is. Is it really about developing an innovative game or something else? If have seen many many commercial successful games that where not innovative at all but really fun and easy to play with a simple game play that kept consumers engaged.

Use feedback as a guide, not a blueprint. Innovate thoughtfully by filtering ideas based on the game’s core vision, prototyping as much as possible, and keeping a pulse on both new players and long-term fans. Some feedback may seem popular but can disrupt long-term player engagement. Innovations should prioritize the depth and replayability of the game rather than catering to trends that might lose appeal. Innovations are vital, but they may not appeal to long-time fans if they stray too far from what is beloved from the game. Introducing new mechanics or concepts in a way that’s easy for existing players to understand and enjoy can help bridge this gap, allowing for new ideas without compromising the game’s identity.

Prioritize innovative ideas: Explore strategies for prioritizing innovative ideas in game development, considering the conflicting feedback you've received. Refine your development process: Learn how to effectively handle diverse opinions from game testers and refine your game development process for better outcomes. Don't dismiss feedback too early: Negative feedback can be a valuable source for improvement. Don't dismiss it prematurely just to protect your ideas. Balance conflicting values: In educational game design, it's crucial to balance the often conflicting values of game designers, instructional designers, and content experts.

I turn to data and player insights as my guide. I prioritize feedback from core players - those most engaged and representative of our target audience - and look for patterns across responses. Running A/B tests or creating small prototypes also helps validate ideas before going all in. I keep the team aligned by sharing findings transparently, explaining why certain directions make sense based on player impact and feasibility. This approach keeps innovation player-centered while ensuring we make informed, strategic decisions together.

Just go with your instict. If you know what you want, you’re gonna get it. If you don’t KNOW you’re gonna get it, you should consider changing business…