Algunos Gráficos Sinfonía Nº 3, Renana, de Schumann
Algunos Gráficos Sinfonía Nº 3, Renana, de Schumann
Algunos Gráficos Sinfonía Nº 3, Renana, de Schumann
m M R/H Comment
1 3 6 5
Lebhaft
I 6 5 R V6
2 3
1 3 6 5
(Lebhaft)
411
fff
Julian Horton. “Cyclical
V6 9 8 u V4 3
thema4c process in 4
the nineteenth-
century symphony”. Example 9.8c Schumann, Symphony No. 3, V, bars 394–9.
Julian Horton (ed.).
The Cambridge 6 5 1
394 Schneller
Companion to the
Symphony. Cambridge 3 3
3
V 9 8 I
N 5
4 3
202 Julian Horton
Sehr mässig anticipation of 'x'
17
p
anticipation of 'x'
X: tema del Example 9.9b Schumann, Symphony No. 3, IV, bars 1–8.
Preludio en Mi b M Feierlich 'x' 'x' (initial fourth omitted) 'x' (diminished and extended)
de El Clave bien
1
temperado, libro I,
de Bach f
pp
Julian Horton. “Cyclical
thema4c process in the
nineteenth-century
symphony”. Julian Example 9.9c Schumann, Symphony No. 3, V, bars 97–9.
Horton (ed.). The
(Lebhaft)
to the Symphony.
Cambridge University p p
Press, 2013.
203 Cyclical thematic processes in the nineteenth century
(Lebhaft)
271
sf
'x'
'x'
sf
sf
'x'
Julian Horton. 'x'
“Cyclical thema4c
275 sf
process in the
nineteenth-century
symphony”. Julian
Horton (ed.). The
Cambridge
Companion to the
Symphony.
Cambridge
University Press,
2013.
Finale as the substance of its transitions and development, subsequently
combined with the movement’s first theme, in diminution, in the devel-
opment. This line of thematic action culminates in the standing on V that
supplies the transition to the coda in bars 271–398 (Example 9.9d), above
Middleground Structure in Schumann’s Sonata Expositions 253
Table 12.3. Schumann, Rhenish Symphony, Op. 97, I, Formal Outline of Exposition
Measure Numbers Formal Function Harmonic Orientation
Peter H. Smith. “Associa4ve Harmony, Tonal Pairing, and Middleground Structure in Schumann’s Sonata
Exposi4ons”. Roe-Min Kok & Laura Tunbridge (eds.). Rethinking Schumann. Oxford University Press, 2011.
Petermultiple
H. Smith. “Associa4ve Harmony,
keys and thus onlyTonal Pairing,
weakly and Middleground
articulate Structure
an apparent in Schumann’s
secondary Sonata
tonal center
Exposi4ons”. Roe-Min Kok & Laura Tunbridge (eds.). Rethinking Schumann. Oxford University Press, 2011.
within an expository I—IIn–V progression. Furthermore Schumann prepares
the entrance of his G Stufe with a prolongation of its dominant, which is itself
256 Analytical Approaches
Figure 12.13. Schumann, Rhenish Symphony, Op. 97, I, graph of mm. 1–57.
Peter H. Smith. “Associa4ve Harmony, Tonal Pairing, and Middleground Structure in Schumann’s Sonata
Exposi4ons”. Roe-Min Kok & Laura Tunbridge (eds.). Rethinking Schumann. Oxford University Press, 2011.
continuity across various formal levels. Here on the lower level there is really no
Figure 12.12. Schumann, Rhenish Symphony, Op. 97, I, graph of mm. 57–135.
Peter H. Smith. “Associa4ve Harmony, Tonal Pairing, and Middleground Structure in Schumann’s Sonata
Exposi4ons”. Roe-Min Kok & Laura Tunbridge (eds.). Rethinking Schumann. Oxford University Press, 2011.
258 Analytical Approaches
within the tonic area, where the modulation to G highlights the recently exited
Peter Ef
H. Smith. “Associa4ve
by means Harmony,
of a V-VI Tonal Pairing,
progression atand Middleground
measure Structure and
39. Similarly in Schumann’s
across aSonata
still
Exposi4ons”. Roe-Min Kok & Laura Tunbridge (eds.). Rethinking Schumann. Oxford University Press, 2011.
larger formal level, the development begins at measure 185 with an immediate
outburst on G (subito fff ), which functions as V/C but nevertheless enters via a
Example 6-11a: Schumann, Symphony No. 3 (“Rhenish”), first movement, mm. 1– 6
b 3 œ ˙ œ œ œ . n œJ ˙œ œ œ œ. œ
b
& b 4 œ̇ œ œ œ. J J
œ œ
b 3 ˙. ˙.
& b b4 ∑ ∑ ∑ ∑ n˙ . n œœ Œ Œ n ˙ . n œœ Œ Œ
b 3
& b b4 Œ Œ ∑ ˙ œ œ j
John Daverio. œ nœ . nœ ˙ . ˙. ˙. ˙.
Crossing Paths:
? b b 34 ˙ œ œ n œ . n œj .
Schubert, Schumann b ˙ ˙. ˙. ˙. ˙˙ .. ˙˙ ..
and Brahms. Oxford
University Press,
2008
Example 6-11c: Brahms, Symphony No. 3, first movement, mm. 3 – 4
√˙
Violins:
6 j
& b 4 œ Œ œ. œ ˙
3