You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
iMOD-WQ supports a recursive bisection cut. This has the nice property of resulting in rectangular partitions, which aligns reasonably well with structured topologies.
Here is a basic implementation that results in a label array:
But anyway, this scheme also works for unstructured grids; instead of cutting by row and column, we'd cut by x and y bounds. It might make more sense to add this xugrid instead as an alternative scheme to METIS partioning.
The most controversial subject is what to do in case the number of partitions isn't a power of 2. An easy way around is to sort by some measure and then bisect some partitions first, e.g. those with the largest weight.
I would expect this to be noticable inferior to METIS, since METIS doesn't need this "rounding off" when the desired number of partitions isn't a power of two.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
iMOD-WQ supports a recursive bisection cut. This has the nice property of resulting in rectangular partitions, which aligns reasonably well with structured topologies.
Here is a basic implementation that results in a
label
array:But anyway, this scheme also works for unstructured grids; instead of cutting by row and column, we'd cut by x and y bounds. It might make more sense to add this xugrid instead as an alternative scheme to METIS partioning.
The most controversial subject is what to do in case the number of partitions isn't a power of 2. An easy way around is to sort by some measure and then bisect some partitions first, e.g. those with the largest weight.
I would expect this to be noticable inferior to METIS, since METIS doesn't need this "rounding off" when the desired number of partitions isn't a power of two.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: