Skip to content

Do we have some idea for rspack #10630

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Open
2 tasks done
colmugx opened this issue Sep 28, 2024 · 1 comment · May be fixed by #10723
Open
2 tasks done

Do we have some idea for rspack #10630

colmugx opened this issue Sep 28, 2024 · 1 comment · May be fixed by #10723
Assignees
Milestone

Comments

@colmugx
Copy link

colmugx commented Sep 28, 2024

Is your feature request related to a problem? Please describe.

I wish we can use rspack instead webpack5, to improve experience for develop.

Powered by Rust, Rspack delivers blazing-fast build times, dramatically accelerating our development workflows. Its seamless integration with the Webpack ecosystem ensures a smooth transition for our projects.

Describe the solution you'd like

please check this: https://github.com/web-infra-dev/rspack

Describe alternatives you've considered

No response

Anything else?

No response

Please accept these terms

@colmugx colmugx added the feature-pending-triage A new feature request pending triage to confirm validity. label Sep 28, 2024
@jasongitmail
Copy link

Although I see JS-based frameworks converging on Vite as the standard bundler long term, +1 for rspack as an easy way to speed iteration for developers in the near term.

It hit 1.0 in August: https://rspack.dev/blog/announcing-1-0

@NathanWalker NathanWalker self-assigned this Mar 21, 2025
@NathanWalker NathanWalker added feature in progress and removed feature-pending-triage A new feature request pending triage to confirm validity. labels Mar 21, 2025
@NathanWalker NathanWalker added this to the 9.0 milestone Mar 21, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

3 participants