You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
For the construction year 1958-1968 in German SFD of type "_2", e.g. "tabula_standard_2_SFH", a solid wall is missing in the wall construction. Currently the wall only consits of insulation and wood fibreboard of 2 cm. It would make me feel kind of uncomfortable living in this house.
A solid wall part could be added as in type "_1" of the corresponding contruction year.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
which means that the second wall type is only very slightly influencing the overall U-value. TABULA says 141.2 m² for wall type 1 and 8.7 m² for wall type 2, so about the relation that is implemented here.
Furthermore, TABULA expects a U-value of 0.8 W/m²K for wall type 2. The construction mentioned here gives 0.75 W/m²K which is actually a little too good (!).
Thermal mass is also almost not influenced by this small share of wall area.
My opinion on this is therefore that it's not necessary to change this.
For the construction year 1958-1968 in German SFD of type "_2", e.g. "tabula_standard_2_SFH", a solid wall is missing in the wall construction. Currently the wall only consits of insulation and wood fibreboard of 2 cm. It would make me feel kind of uncomfortable living in this house.
A solid wall part could be added as in type "_1" of the corresponding contruction year.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: