Skip to content

readthedocs build is failing #1813

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom
Closed
dhalbert opened this issue Apr 18, 2019 · 3 comments
Closed

readthedocs build is failing #1813

dhalbert opened this issue Apr 18, 2019 · 3 comments
Assignees
@tannewt
Milestone
4.0.0 - Bluetooth

Comments

@dhalbert
Copy link
Collaborator

The readthedocs builds have been failing for some time, and we didn't really notice.
https://readthedocs.org/projects/circuitpython/builds/

The latest failure is:
ModuleNotFoundError: No module named 'sphinxcontrib.rsvgconverter'
but if you go back a bit, there's an error about a png file that's not really PNG (?).

(/usr/share/texlive/texmf-dist/tex/latex/amsfonts/umsb.fd) [1{/var/lib/texmf/fo
nts/map/pdftex/updmap/pdftex.map}] [2] [1] [2] [1] [2]libpng error: Not a PNG file

Chapter 1.

!pdfTeX error: pdflatex (file ./907b5cd1d6faf78dae6eaa9257a2cc7c50629e51.png): 
libpng: internal error
 ==> Fatal error occurred, no output PDF file produced!
@dhalbert dhalbert added this to the 4.0.0 - Bluetooth milestone Apr 18, 2019
@tannewt tannewt self-assigned this Apr 18, 2019
@tannewt
Copy link
Member

tannewt commented Apr 18, 2019

I've been working on fixing this. By "back a bit" I believe you mean an older build. It was happening because the png was hosted on github and loading it from github returned an html page.

@dhalbert
Copy link
Collaborator Author

It worked! I just refreshed the rtd page!

image

@dhalbert
Copy link
Collaborator Author

Fixed by #1811 and #1805.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees

@tannewt tannewt

Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Milestone
4.0.0 - Bluetooth
Development

No branches or pull requests
2 participants
@tannewt @dhalbert