@kattni @makermelissa @hugodahl What do you think about this? I've seen two repos failing with this check on examples. Library code itself shouldn't duplicate code, although we may want to raise the bar for it a bit.

I think this is the correct way to fix it. At least until we have something more dynamic in place.

The changes I've made in #109 should address this issue, since it checks each file in the /examples directory individually. I also believe that @kattni had tried using that duplicate-code disable flag, to no avail, though I may have misunderstood that.

The changes I've made in #109 should address this issue, since it checks each file in the /examples directory individually. I also believe that @kattni had tried using that duplicate-code disable flag, to no avail, though I may have misunderstood that.

Ah! That will work. Do you know what the roll out plan is for this config?

Unfortunately, I don't know what the rollout plan is. @dherrada may know, but that's about all I can provide.

@tannewt @hugodahl I'm planning on running the patch in the next hour or so.

Should this PR be closed since there's #109 for it, or do we want to keep it around for a bit in case we need to refine the process some?

This would not have worked anyway, duplicate code cannot be disabled in the way other directives can. Closing this PR as we resolved it in another PR.