Skip to content

Commit 2799568

Browse files
committed
On sparc64+ext4, suppress test failures from known WAL read failure.
Buildfarm members kittiwake, tadarida and snapper began to fail frequently when commits 3cd9c3b and f47ed79 added tests of concurrency, but the problem was reachable before those commits. Back-patch to v10 (all supported versions). Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/20220116210241.GC756210@rfd.leadboat.com
1 parent aa58f5c commit 2799568

File tree

2 files changed

+25
-0
lines changed

2 files changed

+25
-0
lines changed

contrib/amcheck/t/003_cic_2pc.pl

Lines changed: 2 additions & 0 deletions
Original file line numberDiff line numberDiff line change
@@ -11,6 +11,8 @@
1111

1212
use Test::More tests => 5;
1313

14+
local $TODO = 'filesystem bug' if TestLib::has_wal_read_bug;
15+
1416
my ($node, $result);
1517

1618
#

src/test/perl/TestLib.pm

Lines changed: 23 additions & 0 deletions
Original file line numberDiff line numberDiff line change
@@ -220,6 +220,29 @@ sub perl2host
220220
return $dir . $leaf;
221221
}
222222

223+
=pod
224+
225+
=item has_wal_read_bug()
226+
227+
Returns true if $tmp_check is subject to a sparc64+ext4 bug that causes WAL
228+
readers to see zeros if another process simultaneously wrote the same offsets.
229+
Consult this in tests that fail frequently on affected configurations. The
230+
bug has made streaming standbys fail to advance, reporting corrupt WAL. It
231+
has made COMMIT PREPARED fail with "could not read two-phase state from WAL".
232+
Non-WAL PostgreSQL reads haven't been affected, likely because those readers
233+
and writers have buffering systems in common. See
234+
https://postgr.es/m/20220116210241.GC756210@rfd.leadboat.com for details.
235+
236+
=cut
237+
238+
sub has_wal_read_bug
239+
{
240+
return
241+
$Config{osname} eq 'linux'
242+
&& $Config{archname} =~ /^sparc/
243+
&& !run_log([ qw(df -x ext4), $tmp_check ], '>', '/dev/null', '2>&1');
244+
}
245+
223246
sub system_log
224247
{
225248
print("# Running: " . join(" ", @_) . "\n");

0 commit comments

Comments
 (0)