Skip to content

feat(eslint-plugin-template): [click-events-have-key-events] Added ignoreWithDirectives option #2365

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Conversation

jelledijkstra97
Copy link
Contributor

@jelledijkstra97 jelledijkstra97 commented Apr 10, 2025

Added the ignoreWithDirective option to the click-events-have-key-events rule. See #1996

@jelledijkstra97 jelledijkstra97 changed the title Added ignoreWithDirectives option to the click-events-have-key-events… feat(eslint-plugin-template): [click-events-have-key-events] Added ignoreWithDirectives option Apr 10, 2025
Copy link

nx-cloud bot commented May 8, 2025

View your CI Pipeline Execution ↗ for commit fbae881.

Command Status Duration Result
nx run-many -t e2e-suite --parallel 1 ✅ Succeeded 22s View ↗
nx run-many -t test --codeCoverage ✅ Succeeded 1m 7s View ↗
nx run-many -t build,typecheck,check-rule-docs,... ✅ Succeeded 45s View ↗
nx-cloud record -- pnpm nx sync:check ✅ Succeeded 3s View ↗
nx-cloud record -- pnpm format-check ✅ Succeeded 5s View ↗
nx run-many -t test ✅ Succeeded 26s View ↗
nx run-many -t build ✅ Succeeded 12s View ↗

☁️ Nx Cloud last updated this comment at 2025-05-31 11:18:24 UTC

Copy link
Member

@JamesHenry JamesHenry left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks for this @jelledijkstra97 please have a run through the commands with have in ci.yml and make sure they are all passing

@jelledijkstra97
Copy link
Contributor Author

@JamesHenry I updated the docs and the tests succeed on my machine now

Copy link

codecov bot commented May 31, 2025

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 92.89%. Comparing base (d37c7bd) to head (fbae881).
Report is 8 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main    #2365      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   92.88%   92.89%   +0.01%     
==========================================
  Files         197      197              
  Lines        4145     4154       +9     
  Branches      970      973       +3     
==========================================
+ Hits         3850     3859       +9     
  Misses        227      227              
  Partials       68       68              
Flag Coverage Δ
unittest 92.89% <100.00%> (+0.01%) ⬆️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

Files with missing lines Coverage Δ
...template/src/rules/click-events-have-key-events.ts 100.00% <100.00%> (ø)
.../tests/rules/click-events-have-key-events/cases.ts 100.00% <ø> (ø)
🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.
  • 📦 JS Bundle Analysis: Save yourself from yourself by tracking and limiting bundle sizes in JS merges.

@JamesHenry JamesHenry merged commit 8118854 into angular-eslint:main May 31, 2025
8 checks passed
@JamesHenry
Copy link
Member

Thanks again!

igord pushed a commit to tcorral/angular-eslint that referenced this pull request Jun 1, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants