Skip to content

[SPARK-12165] [ADDENDUM] Fix outdated comments on unroll test #10229

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

andrewor14
Copy link
Contributor

@andrewor14 andrewor14 changed the title [SPARK-12165] [ADDENDUM] Add comments to unroll test [SPARK-12165] [ADDENDUM] Fix outdated comments on unroll test Dec 9, 2015
@andrewor14
Copy link
Contributor Author

retest this please

@JoshRosen
Copy link
Contributor

This only affects comments, not tests, so I'm going to merge it now. Thanks Andrew!

asfgit pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Dec 10, 2015
JoshRosen

Author: Andrew Or <andrew@databricks.com>

Closes #10229 from andrewor14/unroll-test-comments.

(cherry picked from commit 8770bd1)
Signed-off-by: Josh Rosen <joshrosen@databricks.com>
@asfgit asfgit closed this in 8770bd1 Dec 10, 2015
@SparkQA
Copy link

SparkQA commented Dec 10, 2015

Test build #47450 has finished for PR 10229 at commit e38dddb.

  • This patch fails from timeout after a configured wait of 250m.
  • This patch merges cleanly.
  • This patch adds the following public classes (experimental):\n * logInfo(s\"HBase class not found $e\")\n * logDebug(\"HBase class not found\", e)\n

@SparkQA
Copy link

SparkQA commented Dec 10, 2015

Test build #47463 has finished for PR 10229 at commit e38dddb.

  • This patch passes all tests.
  • This patch merges cleanly.
  • This patch adds no public classes.

@andrewor14 andrewor14 deleted the unroll-test-comments branch December 21, 2015 21:39
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants