Skip to content

[SPARK-48894][TESTS] Upgrade docker-java to 3.4.0 #47344

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

wayneguow
Copy link
Contributor

What changes were proposed in this pull request?

This PR aims to upgrade docker-java to 3.4.0.

Why are the changes needed?

There some improvements, such as:

  • Enhancements

Enable protocol configuration of SSLContext (docker-java/docker-java#2337)

  • Bug Fixes

Consider already existing images as successful pulls (docker-java/docker-java#2335)

Full release notes:
https://github.com/docker-java/docker-java/releases/tag/3.4.0

Does this PR introduce any user-facing change?

No.

How was this patch tested?

Pass GA.

Was this patch authored or co-authored using generative AI tooling?

No.

@github-actions github-actions bot added the BUILD label Jul 14, 2024
@wayneguow wayneguow marked this pull request as ready for review July 15, 2024 01:46
@yaooqinn yaooqinn closed this in d343b23 Jul 15, 2024
@yaooqinn
Copy link
Member

Thanks, merging to master

jingz-db pushed a commit to jingz-db/spark that referenced this pull request Jul 22, 2024
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?

This PR aims to upgrade `docker-java` to 3.4.0.

### Why are the changes needed?

There some improvements, such as:

- Enhancements

Enable protocol configuration of SSLContext (docker-java/docker-java#2337)

- Bug Fixes

Consider already existing images as successful pulls (docker-java/docker-java#2335)

Full release notes:
https://github.com/docker-java/docker-java/releases/tag/3.4.0

### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?

No.

### How was this patch tested?

Pass GA.

### Was this patch authored or co-authored using generative AI tooling?

No.

Closes apache#47344 from wayneguow/SPARK-48894.

Authored-by: Wei Guo <guow93@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Kent Yao <yao@apache.org>
attilapiros pushed a commit to attilapiros/spark that referenced this pull request Oct 4, 2024
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?

This PR aims to upgrade `docker-java` to 3.4.0.

### Why are the changes needed?

There some improvements, such as:

- Enhancements

Enable protocol configuration of SSLContext (docker-java/docker-java#2337)

- Bug Fixes

Consider already existing images as successful pulls (docker-java/docker-java#2335)

Full release notes:
https://github.com/docker-java/docker-java/releases/tag/3.4.0

### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?

No.

### How was this patch tested?

Pass GA.

### Was this patch authored or co-authored using generative AI tooling?

No.

Closes apache#47344 from wayneguow/SPARK-48894.

Authored-by: Wei Guo <guow93@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Kent Yao <yao@apache.org>
himadripal pushed a commit to himadripal/spark that referenced this pull request Oct 19, 2024
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?

This PR aims to upgrade `docker-java` to 3.4.0.

### Why are the changes needed?

There some improvements, such as:

- Enhancements

Enable protocol configuration of SSLContext (docker-java/docker-java#2337)

- Bug Fixes

Consider already existing images as successful pulls (docker-java/docker-java#2335)

Full release notes:
https://github.com/docker-java/docker-java/releases/tag/3.4.0

### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?

No.

### How was this patch tested?

Pass GA.

### Was this patch authored or co-authored using generative AI tooling?

No.

Closes apache#47344 from wayneguow/SPARK-48894.

Authored-by: Wei Guo <guow93@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Kent Yao <yao@apache.org>
@wayneguow wayneguow deleted the SPARK-48894 branch February 11, 2025 04:25
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants