bug symfony#3504 fix include directive so that the contents are really included (xabbuh)

weaverryan · weaverryan · commit 272197be5d22 · 2014-02-02T21:33:09.000-06:00
This PR was merged into the 2.4 branch. Discussion ---------- fix include directive so that the contents are really included | Q | A | ------------- | --- | Doc fix? | yes | New docs? | no | Applies to | 2.4+ | Fixed tickets | Commits ------- 3090cf2 fix include directive so that the contents are really included
diff --git a/book/includes/_service_container_my_mailer.rst.inc b/book/includes/_service_container_my_mailer.rst.inc
@@ -16,8 +16,7 @@
             xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance"
             xsi:schemaLocation="http://symfony.com/schema/dic/services
                 http://symfony.com/schema/dic/services/services-1.0.xsd"
-            >
-
+        >
             <services>
                 <service id="my_mailer" class="Acme\HelloBundle\Mailer">
                     <argument>sendmail</argument>
@@ -33,4 +32,4 @@
         $container->setDefinition('my_mailer', new Definition(
             'Acme\HelloBundle\Mailer',
             array('sendmail')
-        ));
+        ));
diff --git a/book/service_container.rst b/book/service_container.rst
@@ -103,7 +103,7 @@ for you. In order for this to work, you must *teach* the container how to
 create the ``Mailer`` service. This is done via configuration, which can
 be specified in YAML, XML or PHP:
 
-.. include includes/_service_container_my_mailer.rst.inc
+.. include:: includes/_service_container_my_mailer.rst.inc
 
 .. note::
 
@@ -643,7 +643,7 @@ which has a ``getMailerMethod()`` method on it, which will return a string
 like ``sendmail`` based on some configuration. Remember that the first argument
 to the ``my_mailer`` service is the simple string ``sendmail``:
 
-.. include includes/_service_container_my_mailer.rst.inc
+.. include:: includes/_service_container_my_mailer.rst.inc
 
 But instead of hardcoding this, how could we get this value from the ``getMailerMethod()``
 of the new ``mailer_configuration`` service? One way is to use an expression:
