Putting this on hold for now.

Original Comment By: Simon de Vlieger

I had not looked at the source before proposing that, but if it inspire you to do more auto completions I'm happy even if not using rlcompleter2. The code is MIT licensed so if want to take pieces of rlcompleter2 it would probably be ok;

Original Comment By: Leonardo Santagada

Hi.

Looks like there are some interesting features here, however: we already do arg spec stuff, and we already do doc string display of functions, and doing "module.[Tab]" isn't really going to work with the rest of the completion stuff we have, but I have no objections to incorporating some other way to display module docstrings.

So, I don't think it's going to work for us to just use rlcompleter2, but I'm happy to incorporate some of its features into bpython - the regex help looks interesting, but I'll have to think about that a little.

Thanks for pointing it out - I'll see what I can do about getting some of these features into bpython.

Original Comment By:

@santagada, anything you love about rlcompleter2 that isn't in bpython now?

I'm going to close unless this turns into specific features we want to copy from rlcompleter2.

2009... I don't even remember anymore :) Havent used bpython anymore, I will take a look at the project again.

@santagada I'm closing as I've played with rlcompleter a little bit and didn't notice anything I thought we needed - but if there's a specific suggestion feel free to open a new issue.