Skip to content

chore: bump formik from 2.2.9 to 2.4.1 in /site #7763

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Jun 2, 2023

Conversation

dependabot[bot]
Copy link
Contributor

@dependabot dependabot bot commented on behalf of github Jun 1, 2023

Bumps formik from 2.2.9 to 2.4.1.

Release notes

Sourced from formik's releases.

formik@2.4.1

Patch Changes

  • 2b194c2 #3808 Thanks @​NagaiKoki! - fix type of setFieldValue function

  • 708bcb2 #3813 Thanks @​probablyup! - Revert FieldArray "shouldComponentUpdate" performance optimization. As it turns out, it's a common use case to have JSX controlled via non-Formik state/props inside of FieldArray, so it's not safe to cancel re-renders here.

  • 187e47d #3815 Thanks @​probablyup! - Revert Yup transform support for the time being, this may be re-introduced in a future release under an opt-in prop.

formik@2.4.0

Minor Changes

formik@2.3.3

Patch Changes

  • f075a0c #3798 Thanks @​probablyup! - Fixed the use of generics for the ArrayHelpers type such that any[] is the default array type and for each individual method the array item type can be overridden if necessary.

formik@2.3.2

Patch Changes

  • f086b5a #3237 Thanks @​pieplu! - Changed getIn to return undefined when it can't find a value AND a parent of that value is "falsy" ( "" / 0 / null / false )

  • 6d8f018 #3792 Thanks @​probablyup! - Update the type for setFieldValue to reflect the returned Promise and potential returned error(s).

formik@2.3.0

Minor Changes

  • 73de78d #3788 Thanks @​probablyup! - Added typescript generics to ArrayHelpers interface and its methods so that users who use TypeScript can set the type for their arrays and have type safety on array utils. I have also gone ahead and made supplying a type for the generic optional for the sake of backwards compatibility so any existing TS code that does not give a type for the FieldArray will continue to work as they always have.

  • 39a7bf7 #3786 Thanks @​probablyup! - Yup by default only allows for cross-field validation within the same field object. This is not that useful in most scenarios because a sufficiently-complex form will have several yup.object() in the schema.

    const deepNestedSchema = Yup.object({
      object: Yup.object({
        nestedField: Yup.number().required(),
      }),
      object2: Yup.object({
        // this doesn't work because `object.nestedField` is outside of `object2`
        nestedFieldWithRef: Yup.number()
          .min(0)
          .max(Yup.ref('object.nestedField')),

... (truncated)

Commits

Dependabot compatibility score

Dependabot will resolve any conflicts with this PR as long as you don't alter it yourself. You can also trigger a rebase manually by commenting @dependabot rebase.


Dependabot commands and options

You can trigger Dependabot actions by commenting on this PR:

  • @dependabot rebase will rebase this PR
  • @dependabot recreate will recreate this PR, overwriting any edits that have been made to it
  • @dependabot merge will merge this PR after your CI passes on it
  • @dependabot squash and merge will squash and merge this PR after your CI passes on it
  • @dependabot cancel merge will cancel a previously requested merge and block automerging
  • @dependabot reopen will reopen this PR if it is closed
  • @dependabot close will close this PR and stop Dependabot recreating it. You can achieve the same result by closing it manually
  • @dependabot ignore this major version will close this PR and stop Dependabot creating any more for this major version (unless you reopen the PR or upgrade to it yourself)
  • @dependabot ignore this minor version will close this PR and stop Dependabot creating any more for this minor version (unless you reopen the PR or upgrade to it yourself)
  • @dependabot ignore this dependency will close this PR and stop Dependabot creating any more for this dependency (unless you reopen the PR or upgrade to it yourself)

@matifali matifali requested a review from BrunoQuaresma June 1, 2023 18:15
@matifali
Copy link
Member

matifali commented Jun 2, 2023

@dependabot rebase

Bumps [formik](https://github.com/formium/formik) from 2.2.9 to 2.4.1.
- [Release notes](https://github.com/formium/formik/releases)
- [Commits](https://github.com/formium/formik/compare/formik@2.2.9...formik@2.4.1)

---
updated-dependencies:
- dependency-name: formik
  dependency-type: direct:production
  update-type: version-update:semver-minor
...

Signed-off-by: dependabot[bot] <support@github.com>
@dependabot dependabot bot force-pushed the dependabot/npm_and_yarn/site/formik-2.4.1 branch from 5d3db2c to a8de2a4 Compare June 2, 2023 05:23
@BrunoQuaresma BrunoQuaresma merged commit 004ad17 into main Jun 2, 2023
@BrunoQuaresma BrunoQuaresma deleted the dependabot/npm_and_yarn/site/formik-2.4.1 branch June 2, 2023 12:59
@github-actions github-actions bot locked and limited conversation to collaborators Jun 2, 2023
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants